Displaying 20 results from an estimated 151 matches for "conni".
Did you mean:
conn
2020 Aug 19
4
[PATCH v9 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...m/init.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 9 +++++++++
5 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features()
when the guest is not protec...
2019 Jun 13
1
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
...atch 4)
> > * make the genpool based dma pools API tolerate NULL genpool (patch 2)
> > * fix typo (patch 2)
> > * fix unintended code move (patch 7)
> > * add more r-b's
> >
> >
> >
> > v3 --> v4
> > * fixed cleanup in css_bus_init() (Connie)
> > * made cio.h include genalloc.h instead of a forward declaration
> > (Connie)
> > * added comments about dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask values (Connie)
> > * fixed error handling in virtio_ccw_init() (Connie)
> > * got rid of the *vc_dma* wrappers (Connie)
> &g...
2020 Aug 18
4
[PATCH v8 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
I use the original idea from Connie for an optional
arch_has_restricted_memory_access.
I renamed the callback accordingly, added the definition of
ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_MEMORY_ACCESS inside the VIRTIO Kconfig
and the selection in the PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST
config entry.
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
virtio: let arch...
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v12 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...press inaccurate part of the comment in patch 2
(Halil)
- added back virtio_config.h to define
arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access
(kernel robot)
to v11:
- replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
to v10:
- removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include
- wording
(Connie)
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly...
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v12 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...press inaccurate part of the comment in patch 2
(Halil)
- added back virtio_config.h to define
arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access
(kernel robot)
to v11:
- replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
to v10:
- removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include
- wording
(Connie)
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly...
2020 Jul 15
5
[PATCH v7 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...rtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features()
when the guest is not protected.
(Connie)
- Somme rewording
(Connie, Michael)
- moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c
(Christian)
to v4:...
2009 Dec 12
7
Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora
Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are
so similar).
Can anyone here substantiate this claim?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091211/03c9856b/attachment.html>
2020 Aug 31
3
[PATCH v10 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...init.c | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 9 +++++++++
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v10:
- removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include
- wording
(Connie)
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly...
2019 Jun 13
0
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
...dma_pool API not tolerating NULL dma pool (patch 4)
> * make the genpool based dma pools API tolerate NULL genpool (patch 2)
> * fix typo (patch 2)
> * fix unintended code move (patch 7)
> * add more r-b's
>
>
>
> v3 --> v4
> * fixed cleanup in css_bus_init() (Connie)
> * made cio.h include genalloc.h instead of a forward declaration
> (Connie)
> * added comments about dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask values (Connie)
> * fixed error handling in virtio_ccw_init() (Connie)
> * got rid of the *vc_dma* wrappers (Connie)
> * added some Reviewed-bys
&...
2020 Jul 14
4
[PATCH v6 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...o: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features()
when the guest is not protected.
(Connie)
- Somme rewording
(Connie, Michael)
- moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c
(Christian)
to v4:
- separate virtio and arch code
(Pierre)
- m...
2017 Sep 25
3
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
...ilable anymore which still
>> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>
> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of.
> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack.
>
> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would
> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients.
FWIW as the original author of that transport
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com&g...
2017 Sep 25
3
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
...ilable anymore which still
>> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>
> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of.
> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack.
>
> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would
> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients.
FWIW as the original author of that transport
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com&g...
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
...ports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of.
>>> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack.
>>>
>>> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would
>>> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients.
>>
>> FWIW as the original author of that transport
>> Acked-by: Chri...
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
...ports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of.
>>> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack.
>>>
>>> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would
>>> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients.
>>
>> FWIW as the original author of that transport
>> Acked-by: Chri...
2020 Sep 07
8
[PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++
5 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
--
2.17.1
Changelog
to v11:
- replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
to v10:
- removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include
- wording
(Connie)
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly...
2020 Sep 07
8
[PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++
5 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
--
2.17.1
Changelog
to v11:
- replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
to v10:
- removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include
- wording
(Connie)
to v9:
- move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features
(Connie)
- remove virtio device argument
to v8:
- refactoring by using an optional callback
(Connie)
to v7:
- typo in warning message
(Connie)
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly...
2020 Jul 09
4
[PATCH v5 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...| 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v5:
- return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features()
when the guest is not protected.
(Connie)
- Somme rewording
(Connie, Michael)
- moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c
(Christian)
to v4:
- separate virtio and arch code
(Pierre)
- moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
(as interpreted from Heiko's comment)
- moved validatio...
2007 Aug 02
2
how to "authenticate plain" ???
Hello list,
my name is Steven and of course: I got a problem...
we are using dovecot 0.99 because it?s the actual stable version for
RedHat 4 Enterprise.
I am trying to authenticate using "PLAIN" but I don?t know how.
that?s what I am doing:
telnet conny.MYDOMAIN.de 143
Trying IP.AD.RE.SS...
Connected to conny.MYDOMAIN.de.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK dovecot ready.
a1
2010 Feb 24
4
Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-3.4-testing] x86: Generalise BUGFRAME_dump mechanism to allow polled UART irq to
FYI, I see the following build error with this patch...
MRJ
---- new warnings/errors for xen ----
keyhandler.c: In function `__dump_execstate'':
keyhandler.c:96: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn''t match constraints
gmake[5]: *** [keyhandler.o] Error 1
gmake[4]: *** [/tank/ws/xvm-3.4.3/xen.hg/xen/common/built_in.o] Error 2
gmake[3]: *** [/tank/ws/xvm-3.4.3/xen.hg/xen/xen]
2020 Jul 07
5
[PATCH v4 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
....c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v4:
- separate virtio and arch code
(Pierre)
- moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
(Heiko)
- moved validation inside the arch code
(Connie)
- moved the call to arch validation before VIRTIO_F_1 test
(Michael)
to v3:
- add warning
(Connie, Christian)
- add comment
(Connie)
- change hook name
(Halil, Connie)
to v2:
- put the test in virtio_finalize_features()
(Connie)
- put the test inside VIRTIO core
(Jason)
- pas...