search for: conmpil

I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need to compile the CVS version? (3) If I need its source code, does it properly fit within the llvm/projects directory, just like the test suite? And it that where I should execute the cvs co, like like the test suite? Or is i...

...is quite a ways past release 1.8 at this point. If you want to get the release 1.8 preview, please check out the release_18 branch: cvs co -rrelease_18 llvm > > (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front > end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. No, you can build LLVM without it. Some functionality will be disabled, however (like the test cases for C/C++). > > (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need > to compile the CVS version? Binary version should be okay. > (3) If I need its source code...

Hello Hendrik Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:35:25 -0400 you wrote: > (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc > front end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. No. This will only need, if you want to turn your C\C++ sources to LLVM bytecode. > (4) The page http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout says > to get the gcc 3.4 source code. > The instructions to compile it in > http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html seem to deal in gc...

...gt; this point. If you want to get the release 1.8 preview, please check out > the release_18 branch: > > cvs co -rrelease_18 llvm > >> >> (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front >> end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. > > No, you can build LLVM without it. Some functionality will be disabled, > however (like the test cases for C/C++). > >> >> (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need >> to compile the CVS version? > > Binary version should be...