search for: conjured

I have a patch I'd like to commit that adds commentary to asm files about which TableGen pattern generated a particular instruction. The output looks like this: cvtpd2ps %xmm0, %xmm0 # source.c:39 # Src: (intrinsic_wo_chain:v4f32 927:iPTR, VR128:v2f64:$src) # Dst: (Int_CVTPD2PSrr:v4f32 VR128:v2f64:$src)

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > For the name, again, I'd be happy with either llvmcd or llvmgen, witha > > preference for the latter. The more important thing is to makellvm > > code be the default output. > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But,

On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:48 PM, David Greene wrote: > I have a patch I'd like to commit that adds commentary to asm files > about which TableGen pattern generated a particular instruction. The > output looks like this: > > cvtpd2ps %xmm0, %xmm0 # source.c:39 > # Src: (intrinsic_wo_chain:v4f32 927:iPTR, VR128:v2f64:$src) >

I'm using a modified "default config" file for extensions.conf, the one that uses macro-stdexten to handle the stations. We use a TDM30 card for our stations. When a call that has been rung in using that macro transfers the call things work just fine as far as the "other" instrument ringing. But once the ring timeout has expired, the call then drops into the *original

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:17:24AM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it > > conjures up the wrong kind of tool .. something more like yacc or > > bison. However, I don't have any

I've added an introduction article about the ARA on my web site http://www.voip-forum.com/ The same text is now also added to CVS head as README.realtime. On the same site, you will also find the news item about how we used Asterisk for a call from an airline jet above Greenland to Stockholm, Sweden. The world is getting smaller and more connected every day! /Olle

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > --------------------- > > Option b) I am going to expand David's description with more details, > correct me if I am wrong. > > I'll let David continue this part of the thread with you. > > >

Environment: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5.1 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ruby/1.2.6 Ruby/1.8.6(2007-09-24) mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Phusion_Passenger/2.0.1 Server I''ve created several scaffolds that all work, and am trying to set the root page for this app to default to one of the methods. Here''s my routes.rb: ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> Is a new flag appropriate for this or should I just put it under >> -asm-verbose with everything else? If we want a new flag, does anyone >> have a spelling they'd recommend? I'm not particularly fond of >> -asm-pattern but it was the best concise name my uncreative brain could >> conjur up. > >

My girlfriend and I have been dating for two years, and she just told me she has an STI... Actually, I currently have three different models, like: Dog, Whale, Monkey They all have some similar attributes, but, they are unique enough to break into their own models. I could use STI, but I think the table would just have too many columns. Now, I wanted to let the Dog''s, Whale''s

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 14:05, Vikram Adve wrote: > I have been at Microsoft the last couple of days and so couldn't > jointhe discussion earlier. No worries. I knew you'd chime in sooner or later :) > Here's my view of the name issue, and (thereason this is long), a > little about how I think we want users to viewthis tool: > > First, I think the name should

I haven't run out of popcorn watching the "Upstreaming PNaCl's IR simplification passes" thread but one thing struck me that I would really like clarified. It feels like a tangential issue so I thought I'd ask it separately. In the very same message, I see this: >>>> Some background:  There are two related use cases for these >>>> IR simplification

Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes: > On 25 May 2014 21:29, Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss at gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure. I think the only reason our use of aliases worked previously was >> that the optimizer elided them long before they could make it into an >> object file. > > If that is the case, you should be able to just directly replace

...discussion from roughly two years ago - http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-February/038302.html - confirms this, also showing that this optimization can be beneficial. So the questions are: 1. Should it not be always enabled? Why would we want to disable it? 2. Could a better name be conjured for it? As it stands now, the flag sounds like a binary predicate - either relax all, or don't relax all. Maybe something like "mc-early-relaxation" would be more descriptive? Thanks in advance for any insights, Eli (*) For instance in the case of X86, the MCInst emitter shrinks JNE...

Dear All, Thank you very much to every one on the list for the sincere suggestion and recommendations I have received amazing response from all; I will try to recap a) Use CentOS for server infrastructure and fedora 8 on the workstations b) Use K12ltsp-terminal server and all the client machines as thin clients c) Use CentOS as Server and Ubuntu as client OS d) Use

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:11:24PM +0530, karthik iyer wrote: > So my idea goes like this. Basically I have been working on Question > Answering systems. I developed a QA system for "when" type questions (sorry > I cant provide the source code at the moment because my paper is under > review at SIGIR 2014). I used the part-of-speech and developed a weighted > scoring

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 19 October 2012 17:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> That said, I also don't like the idea of filling the IR with tons of target >> specific stuff. > > In this case, I think it's even worse than "aapcs" or "fastcall", that > are

On 19 October 2012 17:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > That said, I also don't like the idea of filling the IR with tons of target > specific stuff. In this case, I think it's even worse than "aapcs" or "fastcall", that are target dependent, but at a higher level. Proposing at which register each variable will be, forces the front-ends to

Mehdi, Hal’s transformation only kicks in in the *presence* of UB, and it does not matter how that UB got there, whether by function inlining or without function inlining. The problem with Hal’s argument is that the compiler does not have a built in ouija board with which it can conjure up the spirit of the author of the source code and find out if the UB was intentional with the

On 6/13/21 3:36 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev wrote: > Haven't got many ideas on this today, preoccupied with other > house-work, but can share a couple :) > > Regarding two implementations - I believe NSS and OpenSSL are licensed > differently and/or are (initially were?) available non-overlapping on > different OSes. A quick googling now showed that they both were >