search for: coniguration

On Nov 5, 2010, at 10:38 AM, tonyg362 wrote: > > I am trying to build llvm-gcc and I keep running into a configure error: > > configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with > --enable-llvm=DIR > > I have an llvm directory which contains the following directories: > > llvm-2.8 llvm-install llvm-obj llvm-gcc llvm-gcc-obj llvm-gcc-install >

I am trying to build llvm-gcc and I keep running into a configure error: configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with --enable-llvm=DIR I have an llvm directory which contains the following directories: llvm-2.8 llvm-install llvm-obj llvm-gcc llvm-gcc-obj llvm-gcc-install I first configure, build, and install llvm by doing the following: configure llvm inside llvm-obj

...ownloading the latest Samba tarball, compiling it into an RPM and then installing that RPM. > missed that - but must be the case because he refers to RHEL7/CentOS7 > which ships with 4.4.4 and not 4.1.x - anyways, the tree brelow the > install prefix is the same and the main part of the coniguration > lives below the lib folder whereever it is located and so the point > was just remove the configs itself won't reset completly You, being (by the sound of it) a Red-Hat user, will very well know that you cannot create an AD DC with Red-Hat packages yet, so, unless you configure it diff...

...conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the > switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): > > ... > Port link-type: trunk > Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 > Untagged VLAN ID : 10 > ... > > Here is my suspicion: > Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN ID of 48. That > would explain why the moment you conf...

This is the first time i wrote you, i would like to know if you have any idea about my problem: ? I install and conigure the last version of openssh and it is working like a root user ? $ ssh root at server ? and it?s just fine, even i can use CVS software, but if a try to use it with other user it doesn`t work ? $ ssh any at server ? ask me for a password and it wrote me, ?have a lot of fun? and

On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for > >> > up-to-date information on this

On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:04:10 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > as you currently don't have a working as desired setup i would start > from scratch because you can't distinct between probably upgrade > related problems and others in your current state The OP does have a working setup, it just isn't working as he expected, probably because

Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas="- lpthread -latlas -lfptf77blas" --with-lapack="-llapack -lcblas" ). (( http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Linear-algebra) ) Prior to compiling R-2.11.1 sh

...RATIONS and SNAPSHOT both have about 500 millions rows The goal: * Add configurations based on the the snapshot that do not currently exists * Delete configurations that do not exists in the current snapshot * Update configuration that have a file_modified data newer than the one stored in the CONIGURATION object. * Observe all changes and log to an AUDIT table This is pretty easy in SQL, but hard in a non set based language.. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Can anyone point me in the right direction? Best, Brian Brian Corrigan Operations Manager MGAM Systems, Inc. 1 Broadw...

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

...Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < > dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > > Hi Boris, > > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the > > switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): > > > > ... > > Port link-type: trunk > > Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 > > Untagged VLAN ID : 10 > > ... > > > > Here is my suspicion: > > Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN ID of 48. Th...

On 03/08/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Weaver wrote: > On 03/08/2017 06:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > > > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hello all, > > >> > > > >> > I've been googling my

...l not work, mostly because the OP compiled Samba into the > default location '/usr/local/samba' missed that - but must be the case because he refers to RHEL7/CentOS7 which ships with 4.4.4 and not 4.1.x - anyways, the tree brelow the install prefix is the same and the main part of the coniguration lives below the lib folder whereever it is located and so the point was just remove the configs itself won't reset completly

Hi All, Samba 3.0.2a is installed on Solaris and works fine with windows NT clients, but it doesn't work with windows XP client which complains that the share path can't find. Here is the basic coniguration: workgroup = GLOBAL netbios name = test netbios aliases = test server string = test Samba 3.0.2a interfaces = hme0 bind interfaces only = Yes security = server encrypt passwords = Yes password server = passwd_server log...

...ues for rate like 8Kbps ? What about using 32-->96Kbps? I let htb to compute quantum, I just set R2Q. I also get the following error: itr kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change Bellow is an exerpt from my coniguration(as produced by htb.init script): tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 99 r2q 1 tc qdisc del dev eth2 root tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1 htb default 99 r2q 1 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 10Mbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 cla...

Hi Boris, what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): ... Port link-type: trunk Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 Untagged VLAN ID : 10 ... Here is my suspicion: Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN ID of 48. That would explain why the moment you configure an IP from that VLAN on eth0 you get conne...

...ald Carter where he said that winbindd on a PDC only alloocates Unix ids for users and groups from trusted domains. Not its own domain. What other way do I have to make files accessable on a share for both domain users? Or does winbind allready can handle this and I have done something wrong in my coniguration. Best regards Marc -- Marc Muehlfeld Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr. Rost Lochhamer Str. 29 - D-82152 Martinsried Telefon: +49(0)89/895578-0 - Fax: +49(0)89/895578-78 http://www.medizinische-genetik.de

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > On 03/08/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Weaver wrote: >> > > I followed your guide to the letter, however I think it seems I >> > > missed something. When I test with telnet to port 25 this is the >> > > result: >> > > >> > > > telnet merlin 25 >> > > Trying 10.10.3.6... >> >

...is Jacobfeuerborn < > > dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi Boris, > > > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > > > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the > > > switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): > > > > > > ... > > > Port link-type: trunk > > > Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 > > > Untagged VLAN ID : 10 > > > ... > > > > > > Here is my suspicion: > > > Your ports have an access...

Am 06.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb Bart Coninckx via samba: >>> missed that - but must be the case because he refers to RHEL7/CentOS7 >>> which ships with 4.4.4 and not 4.1.x - anyways, the tree brelow the >>> install prefix is the same and the main part of the coniguration >>> lives below the lib folder whereever it is located and so the point >>> was just remove the configs itself won't reset completly > >> You, being (by the sound of it) a Red-Hat user, will very well know >> that you cannot create an AD DC with Red-Hat packages...