search for: confusiong

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "confusiong".

Did you mean: confusing
2023 Apr 30
1
[RFC PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: allow usage of vrings smaller than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2
...de node; > > struct hlist_node node_dead; > > worth checking that all these layout changes don't push useful things to > a different cache line. can you add that analysis? > Good point. I think that we can just move these to the bottom of the struct. > > I see confusiong here wrt whether some rings are "small"? all of them? > some rx rings? some tx rings? names should make it clear. The small vring is a device attribute, not a vq attribute. It blocks features, which affects the entire device. Maybe we can call it "small vring mode". > al...
2013 Mar 09
2
SaMBa 4 - authenticate ftp server
Hello guys, Does anyone know if it is possible to authenticate an ftp server (proftpd or vsftpd) based LDAP Samba 4? Thanks -- Celso Vianna BSD User: 51318 http://www.bsdcounter.org Palmas/TO
2023 Apr 30
1
[RFC PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: allow usage of vrings smaller than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2
...l vrings? */ > + bool svring; > + > /* CPU hotplug instances for online & dead */ > struct hlist_node node; > struct hlist_node node_dead; worth checking that all these layout changes don't push useful things to a different cache line. can you add that analysis? I see confusiong here wrt whether some rings are "small"? all of them? some rx rings? some tx rings? names should make it clear. also do we really need bool svring? can't we just check single_pkt_max_descs all the time? > @@ -455,6 +463,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *...
2023 May 01
1
[RFC PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: allow usage of vrings smaller than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2
...ad; > > > > worth checking that all these layout changes don't push useful things to > > a different cache line. can you add that analysis? > > > > Good point. > I think that we can just move these to the bottom of the struct. > > > > > I see confusiong here wrt whether some rings are "small"? all of them? > > some rx rings? some tx rings? names should make it clear. > > The small vring is a device attribute, not a vq attribute. It blocks features, which affects the entire device. > Maybe we can call it "small vring...
2020 Jul 10
7
RFC: Bugzilla migration plan
Dear all, Over the last few weeks with the help of GH folks I've been exploring the options of Bugzilla migration. I believe finally we came to the viable solution which is detailed below. It turned out that GitHub has an internal project rehydration tool that could be used to populate the empty repo contents from the simple serialized format. There is a big advantage of this approach as
2023 Apr 30
1
[RFC PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: allow usage of vrings smaller than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2
At the moment, if a network device uses vrings with less than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 entries, the device won't be functional. The following condition vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS will always evaluate to false, leading to TX timeouts. This patch introduces a new variable, single_pkt_max_descs, that holds the max number of descriptors we may need to handle a single packet. This patch