search for: confusin

...ername and password via krb5 from the trusted domain, > but use the ticket to log in to the Windows desktop and the > Samba file server. Actually no. I fork this thread to specifically asking question about setting up Samba AD DC / ADS with external Kerberos server. Sorry the title a bit confusin, I fixed it a little bit. So presumably the client can login as if login to normal AD DC / ADS. Thank you! -- ____ ____ ____ ____ (stephan paul) Arif Sahari Wibowo /___ /___/ /___/ /___ http://www.arifsaha.com/ ____/ / / / ____/

...d any mails documenting this, so it would be nice if some people could chime in here if that was indeed the plan. Even with this long term plan in mind I would suggest to remove MIBundleOperands. If we implement this plan we should rather change MachineInstr::iterator later instead of being in the confusin in-between state that we have today. - Matthias

...nice if some people could chime in here if >> that was indeed the plan. >> >> Even with this long term plan in mind I would suggest to remove >> MIBundleOperands. If we implement this plan we should rather change >> MachineInstr::iterator later instead of being in the confusin in-between state >> that we have today. >> >> - Matthias > > I’m not sure what you mean by changing MachineInstr::iterator. You mean mop_iterator? Oh sorry, I was talking about mop_iterator indeed. The thing you get when you use `for (MachineOperand &MO : someinstr...

...his, so it would be nice if some people could chime in here if > that was indeed the plan. > > Even with this long term plan in mind I would suggest to remove > MIBundleOperands. If we implement this plan we should rather change > MachineInstr::iterator later instead of being in the confusin in-between state > that we have today. > > - Matthias I’m not sure what you mean by changing MachineInstr::iterator. You mean mop_iterator? You can’t replace an instr iterator with a bundle iterator without breaking some basic invariants: MI == MI->operands_begin()->getParent() T...

...could chime in here if >>> that was indeed the plan. >>> >>> Even with this long term plan in mind I would suggest to remove >>> MIBundleOperands. If we implement this plan we should rather change >>> MachineInstr::iterator later instead of being in the confusin in-between state >>> that we have today. >>> >>> - Matthias >> >> I’m not sure what you mean by changing MachineInstr::iterator. You mean mop_iterator? > Oh sorry, I was talking about mop_iterator indeed. The thing you get when you use > `for (Mach...

...site just had 4 port Digium card fail today. > Also, I am trying to cross connect with another Asterisk system with > > the normal LBO setting (i.e. span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs) but as of yet the > > systems aren't seeing each other at all. Could the side with the high > > LBO be confusing the other side somehow? > > Shouldn't be... you did use a T1-crossover cable to cross-connect the > two Asterisk boxes, right? I've got a little T1 cross-connect diagram > at http://www.asteriskdocs.org/cables/ if you need a reference. > Yes, it's a T1 cross over and t...

Hi, sorry by this off. I'm still try to understand nested design. I have the follow example (fiction): I have 12 plots in 4 sizes in 3 replicates (4*3 = 12) In each plot I put 2 species (A and B) to reproduce. After a period I make samples in each board and count the number of individuals total (tot) and individuals A and B (nsp). Others individuals excepts A and B are in total of

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:32:16 -0600 (MDT) S P Arif Sahari Wibowo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2017-04-20, 03:35, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > I think you really want to move to Samba as an AD DC. > > In that case, how can I setup a Samba AD DC which has its > authentication came from another non-AD Kerberos service? > Preferably in a