search for: confision

Thanks Kelvin I'm a bit confised tho, is this patch already avaiable? if yes, what is the parameter that disable ssl into the smb.conf? Maybe the guys from Enterprise samba have already included the patch into their releases so it's just a maatter of enabling the flag. I'm using sernet-samba-4.2.2 Thanks!

Need your help! I'm very confised and tired, tried a lot of variants but still at the start, even lost all understanding how the permissions and masks works. Please write me a config for the following case: There is a directory: '/home/shared/door', owned by 'michael:office' shared via samba as '[door]' How can I configure the FS and samba to let 'michael'

Hello, I have some problems trying to configure a PDC with OpenLDAP backend using Samba 3.0.1. My LDAP server is working fine and has the samba templates. I am able to configure users. The procedure I am using is I first create the user in the LDAP server using posixAccount, shadowAccount, etc. Then, as root, I write smbpasswd -a user and it works fine. I get the same effect if I use

> On 01 Jun 2016, at 15:59, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:59:29 +0200, Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm facing a strange issue while doing a migration from an hypervisor to another one. The migration takes

Is there anyone out there who has managed to get Paypal immediate payment notificiations to work with the Paypal plugin? I can get as far as making the payment in the sandbox, but can''t get any acknowledgement back to confirm the payment was made. I''m confised as to how Paypal will know where to send the acknowledgement as I''ve not supplied my IP address or anything

Hi all, I cannot figure out why is named GenRegisterInfo.h.inc and not GenRegisterInfo.inc ... Is it for a dependency problem? Back again to compilation problems under win32 with VC llvm\lib\Analysis\DataStructure\Local.cpp(628) : error C2105: '--' needs l-value the line is: Result.mergeWith(getValueDest(**--CS.arg_end())); Can I submit patches for mutate it in something like:

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > Hi all, > I cannot figure out why is named GenRegisterInfo.h.inc and not > GenRegisterInfo.inc ... > Is it for a dependency problem? I'm not sure what you're saying here. In the X86 backend, for example, we generate both X86GenRegisterInfo.h.inc and X86GenRegisterInfo.inc. The former is #included into X86RegisterInfo.h and the

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are

No patch available now. Download the source code and modified the source code yourself, and then compile it. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mario Pio Russo Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:01 PM To: Kelvin Yip Cc: samba at lists.samba.org; samba-bounces at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 -

Arg... that's a problem now.. we are not allowed to complie third party software in our dev enviroment, we are only allowed to use packages (that's why we use sernet-samba, which in fairness is great!). any plan to release a proper patch? ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin,

Good Day All Sorry if this is a repeated email, but I need some information about how to disable SSL on a Samba4.2.2 AD domain controller as the nessus scanner is reporting the POODLE vulnerability and we are not allowed to have any of that in our environment. the nessus scan reports poodle vulnerability on all these ports: 443, 636, 3269 I had a look at previous posts but couldn't find a

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:59:29 +0200, Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm facing a strange issue while doing a migration from an hypervisor to another one. The migration takes for ever to start moving the memory. > > The VM had no workload what so ever, just a basic ubuntu

I'm wondering how prevalent the practice of physically segregating voice and data networks is in the Real World. What are the factors that typically lead to such a decision? DIscussions of pros and cons are most welcome by me. Experiences, anybody? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3234