search for: configurins

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "configurins".

Did you mean: configuring
2004 Apr 15
2
BROWSING SUCKS
Hi guys, I got this wired situation. I would appreciate if someone of you could help. NETWORK: We have a windows based network of approx 25 computers (Win 98, Win 2000, in NT, Win XP (both Pro and Home). We have a Samba server running on RH9 which acts as the domain controller and master browser for the entire network (OS level = 70) PROBLEM: SOMETIMES, in the windows, when I open NETWORKING
2007 Apr 23
2
Billion ISDN problem
hello friends, I am configurin my Billion ISDN and when I start asterisk (asterisk -vvvc) I have this error message: [chan_zap.so] => (Zapata Telephony w/PRI) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found Apr 23 15:27:23 WARNING[2205]: config.c:525 process_text_line: No '=' (equal sign) in line 29 of zapata.conf Apr 23 15:27:23 WARNING[2205]: config.c:525 process_text_line:
2018 Jun 13
4
NSS and group enumeration in CUPS...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:07:39 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Ok thats strange, this works fine since Jessie and up. > > Ahe,, probably i'm not explaining me well. I've not 'windows' > troubles, i've troubles accessing CUPS web interface,
2015 Feb 09
3
Postfix , Dovecot & the Spam fight
Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of
2018 Jun 14
3
NSS and group enumeration in CUPS...
Hai, @Rowland. Yes, the link is what i have setup, but in less steps without sssd. For the kerberos part, you only need to add the HTTP/UPN. After a join with winbind you have the host/UPN. I must say that the CUPS setup is working great. Only 1 or 2 problems in almost 2 years. @Marco, > ...but you have added 'locally' (eg, in /etc/group > and /etc/shadow) the user