search for: configure_options

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "configure_options".

2019 Apr 01
1
gencache.tdb: device busy
...onfigure options were: CONFIGURE_PREFIX = /usr/lib/samba CONFIGURE_ENV += CPP="$(CC) -E" CONFIGURE_ENV += CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS)" CONFIGURE_ENV += CUPS_CONFIG=$(USRBINDIR)/cups-config CONFIGURE_ENV += PYTHONARCHDIR=$(PYTHON_VENDOR_PACKAGES)/samba # --enable-fhs should not be on CONFIGURE_OPTIONS += --prefix=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX) CONFIGURE_OPTIONS += --exec-prefix=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX) CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --bindir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/bin/$(MACH64) CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --sbindir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/sbin/$(MACH64) CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --libdir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/$(MACH64) CONFIGURE_OPT...
2016 Feb 25
0
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On linux (not Windows) I doubt using Ninja vs make will make drastic differences.. (Others with actual numbers please chime in to correct me) /* I think the difference could be more beneficial if you're doing incremental builds, but I don't think that is what you're doing.. */ On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On
2016 Feb 25
4
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and >> wanted to speedup my build. >> >> In my build-script I
2014 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Build process ignores BUILD_CC?
Hi, I am still struggling to cross-compile LLVM (using trunk). My cross compiler builds code that cannot be run on the build host. Thus, I need to make use of BUILD_CC/CXX during configuration. My current setup is (heavily boiled down): ../configure CC=cc_cross CXX=cxx_cross BUILD_CC=cc_host BUILD_CXX=cxx_host (plus other flag stuff) The configuration runs fine. However, when calling
2016 Feb 25
1
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:55 AM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On linux (not Windows) I doubt using Ninja vs make will make drastic > differences.. (Others with actual numbers please chime in to correct > me) > > /* > I think the difference could be more beneficial if you're doing > incremental builds, but I don't think that is what
2016 Feb 25
0
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and > wanted to speedup my build. > > In my build-script I use... > > CMAKE_JOBS="1" > ##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1)) >
2016 Feb 25
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
Hi, I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and wanted to speedup my build. In my build-script I use... CMAKE_JOBS="1" ##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1)) JOBS_CMAKE_OPTS="-DLLVM_PARALLEL_COMPILE_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS -DLLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS" [1] says in "LLVM-specific variables" section... ***