Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "configure_options".
2019 Apr 01
1
gencache.tdb: device busy
...onfigure options were:
CONFIGURE_PREFIX = /usr/lib/samba
CONFIGURE_ENV += CPP="$(CC) -E"
CONFIGURE_ENV += CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS)"
CONFIGURE_ENV += CUPS_CONFIG=$(USRBINDIR)/cups-config
CONFIGURE_ENV += PYTHONARCHDIR=$(PYTHON_VENDOR_PACKAGES)/samba
# --enable-fhs should not be on
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS += --prefix=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS += --exec-prefix=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --bindir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/bin/$(MACH64)
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --sbindir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/sbin/$(MACH64)
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.64 += --libdir=$(CONFIGURE_PREFIX)/$(MACH64)
CONFIGURE_OPT...
2016 Feb 25
0
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On linux (not Windows) I doubt using Ninja vs make will make drastic
differences.. (Others with actual numbers please chime in to correct
me)
/*
I think the difference could be more beneficial if you're doing
incremental builds, but I don't think that is what you're doing..
*/
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On
2016 Feb 25
4
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and
>> wanted to speedup my build.
>>
>> In my build-script I
2014 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Build process ignores BUILD_CC?
Hi,
I am still struggling to cross-compile LLVM (using trunk).
My cross compiler builds code that cannot be run on the
build host. Thus, I need to make use of BUILD_CC/CXX during
configuration.
My current setup is (heavily boiled down):
../configure CC=cc_cross CXX=cxx_cross BUILD_CC=cc_host
BUILD_CXX=cxx_host (plus other flag stuff)
The configuration runs fine. However, when calling
2016 Feb 25
1
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:55 AM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:
> On linux (not Windows) I doubt using Ninja vs make will make drastic
> differences.. (Others with actual numbers please chime in to correct
> me)
>
> /*
> I think the difference could be more beneficial if you're doing
> incremental builds, but I don't think that is what
2016 Feb 25
0
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and
> wanted to speedup my build.
>
> In my build-script I use...
>
> CMAKE_JOBS="1"
> ##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1))
>
2016 Feb 25
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
Hi,
I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and
wanted to speedup my build.
In my build-script I use...
CMAKE_JOBS="1"
##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1))
JOBS_CMAKE_OPTS="-DLLVM_PARALLEL_COMPILE_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS
-DLLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS"
[1] says in "LLVM-specific variables" section...
***