search for: configure_dhcp_to_update_

...ver directly on the domain controller. Is there any documentation available for updating BIND9 from a completely separate machine with ISC-DHCP installed? It doesn't seem like copying over the DHCPuser keytab works (dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable). https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 Thanks, Brandon

by modify I mean add, change and/or remove DNS records (depending on the values passed to the API). Also, yes I mispoke, we would only be modifying the records on one DC, and replication would take care of the rest. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:07:28 -0600 > Taylor Hammerling via samba <samba

...take care of the rest. > > > > OK, rather than trying to re-invent the wheel, you will probably find > it easier to script around the 'nsupdate' utility from Bind. > > If you look here, you will find a bash script that uses it: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_ > DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > There is also the samba_dnsupdate python script that uses it. > > Rowland > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- *Taylor Hammerling...

...tell, Samba AD and BIND always go hand in hand, but > > there are at most two DHCPD servers on the net, running on two of the > > DCs. Is this correct? > > Can I suggest you read again the Samba wikipage that you couldn't > find: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_ > DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > it changed yesterday because of a bug. > > Thanks, that's exactly the page I followed when it came to this. I had already fixed the problems with the read access to /etc/dhcp, (chgrp dhcpd /etc/dhcp) and setting the right path in the script. > &...

I know this is samba list and I am hoping that someone with MS AD experience can answer this definitively. Does AD have some kind of data exchange between dhcp and dns so that systems which receive a dhcp lease from an AD DC more reliably register their hostname with AD DNS? Looking at the RFC I couldn't see any reason why this should be the case. But it seems that host name registration for

...hand > > > in hand, but there are at most two DHCPD servers on the net, > > > running on two of the DCs. Is this correct? > > > > Can I suggest you read again the Samba wikipage that you couldn't > > find: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_ > > DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > > > it changed yesterday because of a bug. > > > > Thanks, that's exactly the page I followed when it came to this. I > > had > already fixed the problems with the read access to /etc/dhcp, (chgrp > dhcpd /etc/dhcp) and se...

...example) and the > > Secondary becomes a domain secondary dc, how should I most > > appropriately update the bind zone files to designate that this > > secondary is also a NS name server? Or should I at all? > > See this wiki page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_ > DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > > > > I wasnt sure so what I did do was extend my zone file by adding this > > as a second NS like this: > > > > $ORIGIN shire.middleearth. > > $TTL 86400 ; 1 day > > > > @ IN SOA > &...

Hello there. I hope I'm in the right place for some Samba AD advice. I recently added two extra ADs to a setup I inherited. Originally there was a single Samba AD with BIND9_DLS config. DHCP was separate. Subsequently I installed Samba on two Raspberry Pis to act as backup servers. Basically, I followd this set of instructions:

Hello all. I am currently working on setting an S4 domain to replace our aging samba 3 setup. We have found many answers on the net, in various documentation, but when it comes to setting up beyond one node documentation becomes a little thinner. We are setting up a Primary DC with AD, using BIND9_DLZ, also serving dhcp from Primary, and we want to setup a Secondary that is both a