Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "configlexertoken".
Did you mean:
configlexertokens
2004 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] FreeBSD Support In lib/System
...===================================================
>
> My experiment to build as if Linux has failed:
>
> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/llvm/obj/tools/llvmc'
> Compiling ConfigLexer.cpp
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../tools/llvmc/ConfigLexer.l: In function `
> llvm::ConfigLexerTokens handleSubstitution(llvm::ConfigLexerTokens)':
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../tools/llvmc/ConfigLexer.l:66: error: `assert' undeclared
> (first use this function)
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../tools/llvmc/ConfigLexer.l:66: error: (Each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once fo...
2004 Aug 31
9
[LLVMdev] POSIX compliance
Reid,
>As for Interix support in general, I'm having a hard time determining
>which variant of Unix Interix implements. It seems to be partially Posix
>1 and partially Posix 2 based. Do you have any further information
>related to the specific standards supported by Interix? I don't want to
>incorrectly categorize the Interix support.
I've discussed this subject with
2004 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] FreeBSD Support In lib/System
Jeff/Vladimir:
As with Interix, I've recently added support for FreeBSD into
lib/System. Currently, the implementation of FreeBSD just uses the
"generic Unix" implementation which probably should work on FreeBSD. If
not, I would appreciate it if you could make patches in the FreeBSD
directory. If you do, don't forget that you need to remove anything that
doesn't work in the