search for: config_vhost_dpn

...t;> seems more orgent to fix. >>> Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and >>> if possible test. >>> Thanks! >> >> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >> >> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >> this patch want to address. >> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >> >> Thanks > Sorry I don't understand. After this patc...

...t;> seems more orgent to fix. >>> Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and >>> if possible test. >>> Thanks! >> >> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >> >> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >> this patch want to address. >> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >> >> Thanks > Sorry I don't understand. After this patc...

...and >>>>>>> if possible test. >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >>>>>> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >>>>>> this patch want to address. >>>>>> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >>>>>> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >>>>>> &g...

...and >>>>>>> if possible test. >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >>>>>> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >>>>>> this patch want to address. >>>>>> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >>>>>> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >>>>>> &g...

...t;> Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and >>>>> if possible test. >>>>> Thanks! >>>> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >>>> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >>>> >>>> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >>>> this patch want to address. >>>> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >>>> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>&g...

...t;> Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and >>>>> if possible test. >>>>> Thanks! >>>> I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or >>>> vhost_vsock. All looks fine. >>>> >>>> But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that >>>> this patch want to address. >>>> Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another >>>> menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>&g...

...t redhat.com> > I rebased this on top of OABI fix since that > seems more orgent to fix. > Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and > if possible test. > Thanks! I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or vhost_vsock. All looks fine. But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that this patch want to address. Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? Thanks

...t redhat.com> > I rebased this on top of OABI fix since that > seems more orgent to fix. > Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and > if possible test. > Thanks! I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or vhost_vsock. All looks fine. But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that this patch want to address. Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? Thanks

...> > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > > > > > > > > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > > > > > > > > this patch want to address. > > > > > > > > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > > > > > > > > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do s...

...re could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a >> CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defconfigs even if CONFIG_VHOST is >> not set. >> >> Thanks >> > BTW do entries with no prompt actually appear in defconfig? > Yes. I can see CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y after make ARCH=m68k defconfig Thanks

...re could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a >> CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defconfigs even if CONFIG_VHOST is >> not set. >> >> Thanks >> > BTW do entries with no prompt actually appear in defconfig? > Yes. I can see CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y after make ARCH=m68k defconfig Thanks

...Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and > > > > if possible test. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > > > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > > > > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > > > this patch want to address. > > > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > > > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? > > > > > > Thanks > > Sorry I d...

...d > > > > > > if possible test. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > > > > > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > > > > > > > > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > > > > > this patch want to address. > > > > > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > > > > > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? > > > > > &...

...> > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > > > > > > > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > > > > > > > this patch want to address. > > > > > > > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > > > > > > > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something simila...

...> > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > > > > > > > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > > > > > > > this patch want to address. > > > > > > > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > > > > > > > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something simila...

...BI fix since that > > seems more orgent to fix. > > Pushed to my vhost branch pls take a look and > > if possible test. > > Thanks! > > > I test this patch by generating the defconfigs that wants vhost_net or > vhost_vsock. All looks fine. > > But having CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y may end up with the similar situation that > this patch want to address. > Maybe we can let CONFIG_VHOST depends on !ARM || AEABI then add another > menuconfig for VHOST_RING and do something similar? > > Thanks Sorry I don't understand. After this patch CONFIG_VHOST_DPN is j...

...#39;s somehow similar: a > > > CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defconfigs even if CONFIG_VHOST is > > > not set. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > BTW do entries with no prompt actually appear in defconfig? > > > > Yes. I can see CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y after make ARCH=m68k defconfig You see it in .config right? So that's harmless right? -- MST

We try to keep the defconfig untouched after decoupling CONFIG_VHOST out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION in commit 20c384f1ea1a ("vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig") by enabling VHOST_MENU by default. Then the defconfigs can keep enabling CONFIG_VHOST_NET without the caring of CONFIG_VHOST. But this will leave a "CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y" in all defconfigs and even for the ones that

We try to keep the defconfig untouched after decoupling CONFIG_VHOST out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION in commit 20c384f1ea1a ("vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig") by enabling VHOST_MENU by default. Then the defconfigs can keep enabling CONFIG_VHOST_NET without the caring of CONFIG_VHOST. But this will leave a "CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y" in all defconfigs and even for the ones that