Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "config_s390_guest_old_transport".
2017 Sep 25
0
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of.
Let's see what Connie says. From my side
2017 Sep 26
0
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
thanks applied.
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
2017 Sep 26
0
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
> >> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
> >>
>
2017 Sep 26
0
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:57:26PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 26.09.2017 12:47, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > So it's going to be removed with the next merge window.
> > Where is the patch? ;)
>
> Hmm, so far the code was always enabled by default, so in the unlikely
> case that somebody is still using it, they might not have noticed that
> this is marked as
2017 Sep 26
0
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:41:41PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 09/26/2017 12:40 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 26.09.2017 12:47, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:41:41PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/26/2017 12:40 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 26.09.2017 12:47, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:41:41PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/26/2017 12:40 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
2017 Sep 25
4
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index 48af970..923bf04 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++
2017 Sep 25
4
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index 48af970..923bf04 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++
2017 Sep 25
3
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
>> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>
> I don't have any objections, but there may be
2017 Sep 25
3
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
>> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>
> I don't have any objections, but there may be
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/26/2017 12:40 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
>>>> supports this old virtio
2017 Sep 26
2
[PATCH] KVM: s390: Disable CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT by default
On 09/26/2017 12:40 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/25/2017 04:45 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> There is no recent user space application available anymore which still
>>>> supports this old virtio
2016 Dec 07
1
[PATCH 10/10] virtio: enable endian checks for sparse builds
...+6,8 @@
> ?# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License (version 2
> only)
> ?# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> ?
> +CFLAGS_virtio_ccw.o += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> +CFLAGS_kvm_virtio.o += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> ?s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
> ?ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
> ?s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
Here you could use
ccflags-y += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
for example, or even
subdir-ccflags-y += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
(in case any subdirs ever get added here)
> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +ccflag...
2017 Sep 27
1
[PATCH] drivers/s390/virtio: Remove the old KVM virtio transport
.../s390/virtio/Makefile
>> index df40692..d9942e0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
>> @@ -7,7 +7,4 @@
>> # as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>
>> s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
>> -ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
>> -s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
>> -endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += $(s390-virtio-objs)
>
> Would you mind to simplify the Makefile to just the single line
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += virtio_ccw.o
>
> while you are touching it anyway?
Sure ......
2016 Dec 07
1
[PATCH 10/10] virtio: enable endian checks for sparse builds
...+6,8 @@
> ?# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License (version 2
> only)
> ?# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> ?
> +CFLAGS_virtio_ccw.o += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> +CFLAGS_kvm_virtio.o += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> ?s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
> ?ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
> ?s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
Here you could use
ccflags-y += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
for example, or even
subdir-ccflags-y += -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
(in case any subdirs ever get added here)
> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +ccflag...
2017 Sep 27
1
[PATCH] drivers/s390/virtio: Remove the old KVM virtio transport
.../s390/virtio/Makefile
>> index df40692..d9942e0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
>> @@ -7,7 +7,4 @@
>> # as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>
>> s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
>> -ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
>> -s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
>> -endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += $(s390-virtio-objs)
>
> Would you mind to simplify the Makefile to just the single line
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += virtio_ccw.o
>
> while you are touching it anyway?
Sure ......
2017 Sep 27
5
[PATCH] drivers/s390/virtio: Remove the old KVM virtio transport
...d this.
-
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
index df40692..d9942e0 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,4 @@
# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
-ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
-s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
-endif
obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += $(s390-virtio-objs)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a99d09a..0000000
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,515 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * v...
2017 Sep 27
5
[PATCH] drivers/s390/virtio: Remove the old KVM virtio transport
...d this.
-
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
index df40692..d9942e0 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,4 @@
# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
-ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
-s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
-endif
obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += $(s390-virtio-objs)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a99d09a..0000000
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,515 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * v...
2017 Sep 27
0
[PATCH] drivers/s390/virtio: Remove the old KVM virtio transport
.../s390/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
> index df40692..d9942e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile
> @@ -7,7 +7,4 @@
> # as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>
> s390-virtio-objs := virtio_ccw.o
> -ifdef CONFIG_S390_GUEST_OLD_TRANSPORT
> -s390-virtio-objs += kvm_virtio.o
> -endif
> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += $(s390-virtio-objs)
Would you mind to simplify the Makefile to just the single line
obj-$(CONFIG_S390_GUEST) += virtio_ccw.o
while you are touching it anyway?