search for: config_netfilter_xt_match_iprang

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Summary: iptables iprange Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: paulo.santos at

...FIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CPU=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DEVGROUP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ECN=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_NFACCT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MAT...

...R_XT_MATCH_CONNLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT...

...R_XT_MATCH_CONNLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT...

...R_XT_MATCH_CONNLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT...

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:57:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > >>>On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:57:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > >>>On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

Hello, I tried out kernel 3.1.0-rc2 on my i386 Laptop with Xen 4.1.1. Booting hangs after these messages on the VGA console: pci 0000:02:09.0: address space collision: [mem 0x000da000-0x000dafff] conflicts with reserved [mem 0x0009f800-0x000fffff] reserve RAM buffer: 00000000 0009f000 - 00000000 0009ffff reserve RAM buffer: 00000000 38400000 - 00000000 3bffffff reserve RAM buffer: 00000001

Hello, I tried out kernel 3.1.0-rc2 on my i386 Laptop with Xen 4.1.1. Booting hangs after these messages on the VGA console: pci 0000:02:09.0: address space collision: [mem 0x000da000-0x000dafff] conflicts with reserved [mem 0x0009f800-0x000fffff] reserve RAM buffer: 00000000 0009f000 - 00000000 0009ffff reserve RAM buffer: 00000000 38400000 - 00000000 3bffffff reserve RAM buffer: 00000001

...XT_MATCH_DCCP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DEVGROUP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ECN=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPCOMP is not set CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPVS=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_L2TP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_NFACCT is not set CONFIG_NETFI...

...XT_MATCH_DCCP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DEVGROUP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ECN=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPCOMP is not set CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPVS=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_L2TP=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_NFACCT is not set CONFIG_NETFI...

This patch series aims to move the logical block size checking to the block code. This was inspired by missing check for valid logical block size in virtio-blk which causes the kernel to crash in a weird way later on when it is invalid. I added blk_is_valid_logical_block_size which returns true iff the block size is one of supported sizes. I added this check to virtio-blk, and also converted

This patch series aims to move the logical block size checking to the block code. This was inspired by missing check for valid logical block size in virtio-blk which causes the kernel to crash in a weird way later on when it is invalid. I added blk_is_valid_logical_block_size which returns true iff the block size is one of supported sizes. I added this check to virtio-blk, and also converted

Hello, It looks like upstream linux-2.6.git contains at least the following xen related new features for Linux 2.6.36: - Xen-SWIOTLB support (required for Xen PCI passthru and dom0) - Xen PV-on-HVM drivers - Xen VBD online dynamic resize of guest disks (xvd*) Congratulations! What are the plans for 2.6.37 merge window? I believe at least: - Xen PCI frontend Others? I''m going to

...FIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CPU=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DEVGROUP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ECN=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPVS=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_NFACCT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATC...

...FIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CPU=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DEVGROUP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ECN=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPVS=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_NFACCT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATC...

On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when > > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be > >