search for: config_ip_route_multipath_cach

Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed at all? - They do not apply cean. The kernel is 2.6.13. This configuratio...

Hi, i want to do load balancing of 2 ISP's Everything is set up OK but one of the ISP's is loaded on 100% while the other is utilised on 1 - 5% I've read about Julians patches but they stop at 2.6.14. Is anybody aware of similar patches for higher patchlevels. 2.6.14 is not suitable for my setup Thanks for reading :) -- С уважение, Владимир Витков http://www.netsecad.com

Hi all :) there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like : ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1 all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ... -- Lady Luck

Hi, I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load balancing, but i can not get it to work properly. Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip route add default table 222 proto static. Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian''s one (2.6.18-3-486), same results

...fig : # CONFIG_NET_KEY is not set CONFIG_INET=y CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set But no CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED. -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 00:24 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Helpwith multiISP+ squid&...

...i think that neither a day is enough (i have ssh sessions open for more than that) - There are other values i have to have in consideration?(route tables cache/hash size/mem) -Do someone knows a better aprouch? Another thing(besides the previous problem) is that if i compile the kernel whit (CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED) enabled: [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) The multipath sotps working and all packets get routed to the las iface in the nexthops statements. I try compiling the four multipath modules/algos an modprobing its, but same result. Because of that i have to go...

...r|random|wrandom)... To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Message-ID: <20050926075618.721CC173E66@poczta.interia.pl> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-2 Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed at all? - They do not apply cean. The kernel is 2.6.13. This configuratio...

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

I'm using shorewall 3.0.4 with ubuntu dapper. I've compiled the kernel with the option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I had a trouble with, pptp connection, I'm trying to connect a using microsoft vpn a vpn server out of my lan, and don't work. My files <providers> ADSL1 1 1 main eth1.600 10.190.1.1 track,balance eth0 ADSL1 2 2 main eth1.601 10.190.2.1 track,balance eth0 </providers>...

Hello, does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with -enable-multipath? I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP. Thanks, Cristi Carstea

...r|random|wrandom)... To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Message-ID: <20050926075618.721CC173E66@poczta.interia.pl> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-2 Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed at all? - They do not apply cean. The kernel is 2.6.13. This configuratio...

Hi. I''ve trying to balance outgoing traffic by using multipath routes, but I can''t get it to work. Only one of the routes are used. I''m adding the route like this: ip route add table 101 default \ nexthop via X.X.X.X nexthop via Y.Y.Y.Y It shows up the routing table like this: default nexthop via X.X.X.X dev vlan110 weight 1

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

Hi list, I have tried google but just cant get this to work or figure it out. My setup ======== vanilla 2.6.13 kernel with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y My configuration: A host with two ppp links. Ontop of these two ppp dialup links i have created two CIPE tunnels, one on each link. Both A and B are under my co...

...rnels (2.6.21)? - Is there a way to repair that in order to be able to use these patches? I''m using a vanilla kernel 2.6.21.7 with the following patches: - IMQ - Layer 7 - Julian''s route patches (version for kernel 2.6.21) relevant parts of .config: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y # CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED is not set ... # CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is not set # CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES is not set CONFIG_BRIDGE=m Thanks for any help, François.

...ONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y > CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y > CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y > CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y > CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y > CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y > # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set > # CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set > # CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set > > But no CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED. Ok -- in your squid.conf file, you might try setting ''tcp_outgoing_address'' to the IP address of the interface that you want squid to use. We saw a problem somewhat similar to yours on IRC this morning which was corrected by having the server bind to the correct local address....

...ad seph''s mail from Thu Jan 5 17:02:10 CET 2006. I had the same problem. Solution: Use a kernel > 2.6.11 (don''t know exactly when this was fixed) but with 2.6.14.3 and 2.6.15 this "MASQUERADE: Route sent us somewhere else." never appeared again! And: assure that CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED is not set, it throws a spanner in the works! Thanks, André

...inding outgoing going out one provider only, though if I tell tcrules to send port 25 out a particular provider a lot of the email goes out the one i tell it to but some is going out the main line. I think this is happening because of routes being cached ? I have just found that the kernel has CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y which is noted in the multiisp.html page to change to ''n''. I will go back tonight and rebuild the kernel and see if outgoing balance starts working. > * the track option. Track is used to mark a connection so that it returns > out the same interface the request came...

Tom wrote : >My advice to you is still the same -- you are going to have to use tcpdump >or ethereal to see what is happening. You have the computer there in front >of you >-- we don''t. So only you are going to be able to solve this. We are not. >From the dump you sent, it looks like many SYN packets are being sent on >ppp0 >and never replied to. So you need to

...random route is chosen again, but that is not what we want. I had made no changes to the ip route commands, but then I realised that kernel 2.6.20 has options for multipath (IP: equal cost multipath with caching support), I enabled that and now our kernel options are: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=m But even with these options, and default route set as follows: ip route add default src ip.a.dd.rr mpath rr nexthop via <router1> weight 1 nexthop via &l...