Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cond473".
2015 Apr 21
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Missing canonicalization in LLVM
...low. I’m looking for comments on what others think is the right solution here. Make SROA more intelligent about picking the type?
The code is below with all unnecessary code removed for easy consumption.
Daniel
Before Polly – Prepare code for polly we have code that looks like:
while.cond473: ; preds = %while.cond473.outer78, %while.body475
%p_j_x452.0 = phi double [ %105, %while.body475 ], [ %p_j_x452.0.ph82, %while.cond473.outer78 ]
while.body475: ; preds = %while.cond473
%sub480 = fsub fast double %64, %...
2015 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Missing canonicalization in LLVM
...low. I’m looking for comments on what others think is the right solution here. Make SROA more intelligent about picking the type?
The code is below with all unnecessary code removed for easy consumption.
Daniel
Before Polly – Prepare code for polly we have code that looks like:
while.cond473: ; preds = %while.cond473.outer78, %while.body475
%p_j_x452.0 = phi double [ %105, %while.body475 ], [ %p_j_x452.0.ph82, %while.cond473.outer78 ]
while.body475: ; preds = %while.cond473
%sub480 = fsub fast double %64, %...
2015 Jan 21
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Missing canonicalization in LLVM
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com <mailto:peter_cooper at apple.com>> wrote:
> The first thing that springs to mind is that I don’t trust the backend to get this right. I don’t think it will understand when an i32 load/store would have been