search for: cond4

Hi everyone, I'm having some trouble with my ifelse statements. I'm trying to put 12 conditions within 3 groups. Here is the code I have so far: dat$cond <- ifelse(test = dat$cond == "cond1" | dat$cond == "cond2" | dat$cond == "cond3" dat$cond == "cond4" yes = "Uniform" no = ifelse(test = dat$cond == "cond5" | dat$cond == "cond6") | dat$cond == "cond7" dat$cond == "cond8" yes = "Biased Low" no = "Biased...

...com> wrote: > > which produces > > %arrayidx24 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]]* %A, i64 > %arrayidx21.sum, i64 %add1411, i64 %add > store i64 0, i64* %arrayidx24, align 8 > {{{(5 + ((3 + %n) * %n)),+,(2 * %n * %n)}<%for.cond1.preheader>,+,(4 * %n)}<%for.cond4.preheader>,+,6}<%for.cond7.preheader> This expression is not straight forward because llvm always fold the loop invariant in the AddExpr into the AddRecExpr. If I understand the AddRecExpr correctly, the above SCEV is equivalent to: (5 + ((3 + %n) * %n)) + (2 * %n * %n) * {0,+,1}<%for.c...

...+) ** for (long int k = 0; k < n; k++) ** **A[1 + 2*i][3 + 4*j][5 + 6*k] = 0;* } we'll see *%arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]]* %A, i64 %add109, i64 %add88, i64 %add* *store i64 0, i64* %arrayidx12, align 8* *{1,+,2}<%for.cond1.preheader>* *{3,+,4}<%for.cond4.preheader>* *{5,+,6}<%for.body6>* which looks great; 3 simple indices, no problem. But consider this: *void z2(long int n, long int A[][n][n][100][100]) {* * for (long int i = 0; i < n; i++)* * for (long int j = 0; j < n; j++)* * for (long int k = 0; k < n; k++)* * **f...

Hi all, suppose there is a vector y with rownames: > y cond1 cond2 cond3 cond4 78.952 87.308 86.490 74.040 how can I easily plot this vector using the rownames? plot(y) gives me a plot with a x-axis from 1 to 4 in 0.5 steps, also plot(rownames(y), y) and plot(y ~ rownames(y) don't work. I know I can build a x-axis with axis(1, ...), but in this case I need a character...

...ng some trouble with my ifelse statements. > >I'm trying to put 12 conditions within 3 groups. Here is the code I >have so >far: > >dat$cond <- ifelse(test = dat$cond == "cond1" | dat$cond == "cond2" | >dat$cond == "cond3" dat$cond == "cond4" > yes = "Uniform" > no = ifelse(test = dat$cond == "cond5" | dat$cond == >"cond6") | dat$cond == "cond7" dat$cond == "cond8" > yes = "Biased Low" >...

Dear R users, I have a data where I desire to subset according to certain conditions. However, the script is very messy as there are about 30 distinct conditions. (i.e. same script but with different conditions) I would like to make a user defined function so that I can input the desired conditions and just get the results accordingly. Below is an arbitrary data set & sample statements

Is there a pass I can use after reg2mem to get rid of occurances like this?: store i32 %cond, i32* %cond.reg2mem %cond.reload = load i32* %cond.reg2mem store i32 %cond.reload, i32* %cond4.reg2mem Essentially, in this case, reg2mem creates an extra memory space to store and load a value from just here, and never uses the value again; since this isn't efficient code, I'm wondering if there's another pass I can use to fix the innefficient code reg2mem produces, or if my tr...

Hi friends, I have a matrix with following format. group var1 var2 .......varN c1 group1 1.2399 1.4990....-1.4829 c2 group4 0.8989 0.7849.....1.8933 ... ... c100 group10 ..... I want to draw a profile plot of each condition c1 to c100, which rows in above matrix and each line representing a row should be uniquely colored according to the group(1 to 10). I think this is simple task

...se2: %gep3 = getelementptr i32* %a, i32 3 %val3 = load i32* %gep3 %cond3 = icmp ugt i32 %val3, 3 br i1 %cond3, label %then3, label %else3, !prof !0 then3: call void @error(i32 %i, i32 1, i32 %b) br label %else3 else3: %gep4 = getelementptr i32* %a, i32 4 %val4 = load i32* %gep4 %cond4 = icmp ugt i32 %val4, 4 br i1 %cond4, label %then4, label %else4, !prof !0 then4: call void @error(i32 %i, i32 1, i32 %b) br label %else4 else4: %gep5 = getelementptr i32* %a, i32 3 %val5 = load i32* %gep5 %cond5 = icmp ugt i32 %val5, 3 br i1 %cond5, label %then5, label %exit, !prof...

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag >> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at >> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote: > > I've created a few bugzilla issues with details of some of the things I'll be looking into. I'm not yet done wordsmithing the overall design document.