Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "cond13".
Did you mean:
cond1
2013 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Assert in Scope construction
...);
> assert(ICmp && "Only ICmpInst of constant as condition supported!"); ...
>
> The code it chokes on looks like this (see below). The problem is this
OR-ed
> compare result:
>
> %cmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %j.0, 2
> %cmp5 = icmp eq i32 %j.0, 1
> %or.cond13 = or i1 %cmp3, %cmp5
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ==
> Value V
>
>
> My question - is this a bug or a (missing) feature? ...and how it should
be
> handled in th...
2013 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Assert in Scope construction
...ICmpInst of constant as condition supported!");
> ...
> >
> > The code it chokes on looks like this (see below). The problem is this
> OR-ed
> > compare result:
> >
> > %cmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %j.0, 2
> > %cmp5 = icmp eq i32 %j.0, 1
> > %or.cond13 = or i1 %cmp3, %cmp5
> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ==
> > Value V
> >
> >
> > My question - is this a bug or a (missing) feature?
I think it is a bug...
2013 Jul 02
0
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
On 07/01/2013 09:41 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 02:02, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> One thing that LNT is doing to help “smooth” the results for you is by
>> presenting the min of the data at a particular revision, which (hopefully)
>> is approximating the actual runtime without noise.
>>
>
> That's an
2013 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
On 1 July 2013 02:02, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
> One thing that LNT is doing to help “smooth” the results for you is by
> presenting the min of the data at a particular revision, which (hopefully)
> is approximating the actual runtime without noise.
>
That's an interesting idea, as you said, if you run multiple times on every
revision.
On ARM,
2015 Mar 05
5
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote:
>
> I've created a few bugzilla issues with details of some of the things I'll be looking into. I'm not yet done wordsmithing the overall design document.