search for: concurring

Hi, I use samba for one year only, but with full satisfaction. Only with latest cvs tree I discovered some (maybe particular) problem. In mixed environment of win95oemII and NT4 workst (sp3 or sp4) we share some Paradox 7.0 database on linux server (Rh5.2 and 2.2.0-pre1 kernel). Paradox controls multiuser access to the data with three files: PDOXUSRS.NET (user names etc?), and two lock files,

Hi all, We are using - a dell sc440(Single dual-core intel xeon 3040, 1.86GHz,1066MHz front size bus 2MB cache) as the asterisk server - dell 400sc(Intel P4) as a SER server - digium isdn card, TE120P at Asterisk server - Bandwidth: 2Mbps/512kbps All SIP Phones are registered to SER server, and SER will route all outgoing calls to Asterisk server. My problem is the sound quality goes down if

I have let's say a reception that is comprised of 2 zap extensions and a mobile phone to dial using ISDN through Capi. I want to have a delay before starting dialing the mobile phone so that it rings only when the call has been unanswered for say 25 seconds. I tried to use Capi/2106994444:ww6935555555 but without any success. There is any way to do it or the code has to be modified ? Thanks

Hi, I notice `lli -print-machineinstrs -x86-asm-syntax=(att|intel)' both prefix registers with `%'. Is this right? I thought AT&T did this and Intel didn't. The GNU gas manual concurs. http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html Cheers, Ralph.

When for example some call is wrong error message always looks like this: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /tmp/llvm-svn/llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp, line 247. I believe assert() statements should better be replaced with more

Hello, I made upgrade from 3.0.2-2 to 3.0.4-1. I can''t start more than one domUs concurently. for example: I had 3 domUs called www1, www2, www3. I can start www1 and it works fine. Next I start www2 and server go immediately for reboot. I can start www2 and it works fine. Next I start www3 and server go for reboot. ... What''s happened in 3.0.4-1 ? Thank''s Dusan

I concur. I've run into this exact assert at least 10 different times in the last two weeks since I started with LLVM as I'm learning the particulars of the typing system for function calls in particular. It would be nice if it would tell you what expected signature was, what the value of i was so you know which parameter went wrong, and what the actual type passed in was, as well as what

On 11/04/2015 04:31 AM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > > > Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a ?crit : >> >> Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a ?crit : >>> On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >>>> Hi Lucian, >>>> >>>> It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and >>>> with_libxl enabled.

Hi: How to install and set up my asterisk server with G723 codec to send and receive calls using it. Thanks in advance; Wassim _________________________________________________________________ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:59:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > @@ -1,9 +1,17 @@ > > #ifndef _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > #define _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > > > +static inline void

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:59:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > @@ -1,9 +1,17 @@ > > #ifndef _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > #define _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > > > +static inline void

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > While trying to hunt down a codegen bug (not yet found) ... Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging needs? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > I've collected some small patches you might find useful. Sweet! > Please review and apply as you see fit. I've

This is a patch to X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT() which was hashed over on the Developers list with Intel concurring. It checks whether the -Oz (optimize for size) flag is set or whether the containing function's PGO cold attribute is set. If either are true it emits BT for tests of bits 8-31 instead of TEST. Previously, TEST was always used for bits 0-31 and BT was always used for bits 32-63. Since the BT...

Hi Reid Spencer, > CC=/path/to/llvmgcc CXX=/path/to/llvmg++ configure > make > > and was able to reproduce the problem. Not sure what's up with that but > as Misha pointed out, llvmgcc isn't any "particular" version of 3.4, its > just 3.4ish. I also concur with him that you should file a bug and > attach the pre-processed source to it. You can get that with

> On Jan 4, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 4 Jan 2015, at 23:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com <mailto:chandlerc at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk <mailto:llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>> wrote: >> On 24 Nov 2014, at 17:53,

On Thursday, 16 December 2010, > This cries out for different levels of verbosity. How about printing the encoding information for -verbose-asm=2 (or higher)? I concur, the current verbose level is enough for all my needs, now. If/when I start fiddling with MC, I might find that useful, but a special flag would do just fine. Cheers, Renato -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/

On 11/24/2014 6:38 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > I will not go over the question about running telnet in your > laptop; others will chime in. Now that is out, did you check whether > telnet is running using ps and netstat? useless advise, since telnet is almost always run from a socket, the telnetd is only running if there's an active connection. to the OP, the *correct*

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=officejet+8620+manual I concur - I don't believe there is a password on the EWS. You should be able to print out the network settings from the LCD control panel, which will be 2 or 3 pages and includes info you need like MAC address[es], default and user-set passwords, IP address[es], et cetera.

On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO. > It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But you're > not likely to get the worst offenders to change. totally concur but as long as people are going to use cell phones as mobile computer substitutes, and considering how painful text editing on a

There is software out there which will rebuild. It is advanced level, so I would concur with the others to take it to a professional data recovery service. Most importantly at this moment is to remove the hard drive, or at least shut down the server to minimize the read/write to the disk. The more writes done the less likely recovery will be possible. Also, know whether you just want to