search for: concurrents

Attached another test program. I don't expect it to print any errors with any OS, but I'd like to confirm it for non-Linux SMP kernels. (Except for OpenBSD, it doesn't work correctly in it anyway because it doesn't support mixing write()s and mmap()) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: concurrency.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 2256

Hi, I've just joined the list. Thanks Jean-Marc and other contributors for your efforts with Speex. Anyway - I've been hired by a local firm to investigate, write-code-as-required and generally help them get the maximum bang-for-the-byte for VOIP traffic on the hyperexpensive Internet bandwidth going out of South Africa. I started the process by doing some methodical measurements and

hello all, does anyone has experiencie using asterisk with a digium CARD using G729 managing 120 concurrent calls with SIP and/or H323??? I wanna know if Asterisk is stable doing this....because we wanna implement it in some locations!! Thanks All!! Sebastian. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I would like to track/store concurrent call usage per user by day/week/month and get server totals by day/week/month. Google comes up with mostly info regarding concurrent call limits, though my goal is to calculate actual concurrent channel usage and add it into reporting. I'm using * 1.6.2 + mysql - realtime (no gui). Any suggestions / open-source / AGI on where to start looking

Callers may now optionally set up a concurrent writer thread. The outline of this idea is explained here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-June/msg00010.html The change is quite small, but here are some points which are true but may not be obvious: * All writes return immediately with success (unless we run out of memory), and writes never block. * When going down the READY

On 6/3/19 10:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > docs/libnbd.pod | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > generator/generator | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > lib/handle.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/internal.h | 7 +++++ > lib/socket.c | 22 +++++++++++--- > podwrapper.pl.in | 3 +- > 6 files changed, 177

Hello, I need some help please. I have been told from an administrator that Samba does only support up to 3.000 concurrent CIFS connections and each connections reserve 5MB of memory. If this is true that I would need 15GB of memory to support 3.000 concurrent CIFS sessions how many people have this amount of memory in any server? The second argument which he used was and I quote him

--- docs/libnbd.pod | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- lib/handle.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++ lib/internal.h | 7 +++++ lib/socket.c | 22 +++++++++++--- podwrapper.pl.in | 3 +- 6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/libnbd.pod b/docs/libnbd.pod index

Hi all, If I start two o more connections with diferent users that make a search text to solr I get this message many times: Error: fts_solr: Query didn't return uid If I repeat the test about 2000 times, with only one user concurrent, with 60 diferent users, without concurrent, I get between 0. If I repeat the test about 2000 times, with 2 users concurrent, I get between 3 or 10 errors.

Hi, I just found something weird for mongrel with static files. Performance endlessly decreases if mongrel serve static files from simultaneous requests : Here is the test setup: Ruby on Rails Mongrel (tested with 1.3.12.4 and 1.3.13-pre installed today) Ubuntu dapper, compiled ruby 1.8.4. http client : while true; do ab -n 1000 -c 30 http://localhost:3000/ 2>/dev/null | grep

Hi all, I have been trying to understand the use of undef in both sequential and concurrent programs. >From the LLVM Language Reference Manual, I see the following definition of undef. "Undef can be used anywhere a constant is expected, and indicates that the user of the value may receive an unspecified bit-pattern". LLVM Language Reference manual also demonstrates how optimizers

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3720 Bug ID: 3720 Summary: ssh-keygen -R fails and/or leaves temp files when run concurrently Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.0p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen

Is it possible to restrict the number of concurrent calls made to a SIP peer? Or maybe the number of concurrent calls made to a particular extension. This way I can avoid asterisk trying to make more voice calls to my remote SIP gateway then I have bandwidth to handle. /davidh

Hi All, Is it possible to go beyond 250 concurrent ZAP channels with some tweaking or workaround ? Meetme uses zap channels, so we could have a max of 250 conference ports. Is it possible to higher this ? "An Asterisk system can only handle a *max. of 250 concurrent ZAP channels*. This is due to the design limit (255) within the ZAP channel driver." Thanks, ~Vamsi -------------- next

Can Samba handle in the range of 1million to 3 millions concurrently open files? If so, then from which Samba version onwards? Does it have any benchmarking results on maximum number of open files that Samba can have concurrently? Any reply to this question is highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Santosh

Hello - I've combed the wiki and archives a bit and can't seem to find what I am lookng for. It seems that BlackBerry Internet server has an issue with IMAP accounts along with IDLE and concurrent connections. Please see the following link (sorry it's fairly long):

Samba Gurus, How can the number of concurrent connections to a Samba share be limited. Say for example you have an article of software for which you only have 5 licences. When all five seats are used and 6th connection is attempted the user cannot connect. Regards, Paul Ketelaar Paul Ketelaar, Assoc. Dip. Eng. (Elec) paulk@ketelaar.com.au http://www.ketelaar.com.au

Hi, We are trying upgrade our roaming profile sever from Debian Etch to Debian Squeeze. That's means a upgrade from Samba 3.0.24 to Samba 3.5.8. Our production environment has above 600 concurrent users without problem. After upgrade to Samba 3.5.8, server can't manage above 200 users. With 'smbclient', the output is: Error [user] session setup failed: Call timed out: server did

http://dovecot.org/tmp/concurrency.c I'd want to know what results this program gives with different systems. Please test and reply (but don't bother if someone already replied with the same OS+result). I expect it to print: - SMP kernels: "page size cut" once in a while - UP (uniprocessor) kernels: Nothing - The most important thing is that it never prints "broken

Dear Members of Xapian Project, Sorry for troubling you this time. I am currently facing a challenge that I can not search and update Xapian "InMemoryDatabase" concurrently via 2 different threads although I have added the critical area mutex which allows only reading/writing at one single time. More specifically, along with the core dump, the error message was "double free or