search for: concretize

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2881 matches for "concretize".

Did you mean: concrete
2015 Nov 18
3
RFC: Supporting all entities declared in lexical scope in LLVM debug info
Hi, I would like to implement a fix to how LLVM handles/creates debug info for entities declared inside a basic block. Below you will find 5 parts: 1. Motivation for this fix. 2. Background explaining the cases that need to be fixed. 3. An example for each case. 4. Proposal on how to represent each case in dwarf. 5. Secondary (workaround) proposal which might be
2016 Jan 19
2
RFC: Supporting all entities declared in lexical scope in LLVM debug info
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Aboud, Amjad via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I verified that GDB 7.10 does support “DW_AT_abstract_origin” attribute on > “DW_TAG_lexical_block”. > I take it you mean that it does the right thing, finding the direct children of the abstract block when stepping into the inlined subroutine, etc? & this was a
2005 Jan 12
2
Use of concrete rails version per application
Hi all, I''ve more than one rails based applications on my machine. When I upgrade my gems (including rails), I usually have to upgrade each application to be able to continue developing/using it... But some of these web applications don''t need to be up to date. I would be happy enough with older version of rails for these applications (, or I don''t have time to fix
2017 Jun 12
4
How to know the sub-class of a Value class?
As a concrete question, I understand 'Value' class is the parent of many concrete sub-classes. Let's say I retrieve a Value* value = store_inst->getValueOperand(). Unless I know what the sub-type is, how can I further use this object? I tried something like this: ================================================= Value* value = store_inst->getValueOperand()
2019 May 09
2
RFC: On removing magic numbers assuming 8-bit bytes
*From: *JF Bastien via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> *Date: *Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:30 PM *To: *Jesper Antonsson *Cc: *dag at cray.com, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org I don’t think you have consensus to move forward at this point in time. My > expectation, which I think represents LLVM’s historical approach, is that a > path to full support be planned out before this effort starts.
2008 Jan 15
9
things that are difficult/impossible to do in SAS or SPSS but simple in R
Hi all, I'm giving a talk in a few days to a group of psychology faculty and grad students re the R statistical language. Most people in my dept. use SAS or SPSS. It occurred to me that it would be nice to have a few concrete examples of things that are fairly straightforward to do in R but that are difficult or impossible to do in SAS or SPSS. However, it has been so long since I have used
2006 Apr 09
4
Inheritance via Though Associations?
I posted something about this a week ago wihtout response, but have made some progress since. However, I''m still not getting exactly what I want. OK, three core tables: create_table :reference_items do |t| t.column :title, :string, :limit => 255 t.column :year, :integer, :limit => 4 t.column :type, :string t.column
2004 Dec 01
1
Combined variable names (two concrete suggestions)
Very interesting topic. "What I want to know is *WHY* people are doing this?" Here goes my view - I've used many for loops, and each time I realize how stupid that is... AFTER I learned how to avoid it. But it's difficult to avoid them without knowing how to do it. (Monsieur de LaPalice wouldn't have puted it better...) For loops are conceptually very easy to understand.
2018 May 11
6
A Short Policy Proposal Regarding Host Compilers
Hi All- As we all know, the C++14 discussion is flaring up again. Chandler brought up that he would like a concrete plan to switch. In my opinion, this is insufficient, as it will result in us simply having this discussion AGAIN next release. Instead, I would prefer us to have a concrete Policy on our host compilers. That way, changes like this are unsurprising to our users, and advance our
2013 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Resolving a function symbol using JIT.
Hey, I have a situation where in I need to intercept a call to a particular function and return a pointer to a separate implementation of that function using JIT. The scenario is like this: 1. A test code or client code calls a function A() for which a dummy implementation is provided in a library which the test code/client links with during compilation. 2. I create the .bc using -emit-llvm and
2005 Nov 21
0
[PATCH][5/17] USB virt 2.6 split driver---concrete local buffer reference types
This patch implements a local buffer reference type for kernel virtual address space and a remote buffer reference type for buffers up to 16 pages based on grant tables. These types are used by the USB driver for bulk data transfer. Signed-off-by: Harry Butterworth <butterwo@uk.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2010 Apr 19
5
[LLVMdev] Code Size Benchmark
Hi all, We did some benchmarks on code size with clang, gcc 4.5, and open64. Clang performed second in the test. The benchmark is CSiBE. Clang can't compile the linux kernel (some inline asm not supported) and replaypc (error: use of unknown builtin '__builtin_next_arg'). The concrete results are attached. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2017 Jul 14
5
failing to optimize boolean ops on cmps
> > > Not sure about this last part. It is really going to require work by us to > rewrite things. :-) In the mean time, I think we should go ahead with this. > FWIW: My problem is, when put in this framework, we will repeatedly make this same decision, this same way, again and again, and never actually get even started on fixing it :) IE "it's just another small
2012 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] Minimum Python Version
> If there was a concrete need to move to a newer Python version in order to > make lit Python 3 compatible, I would view that as a good reason to move > forward. The concrete need is that users on platforms which ship with Python 3 by default have to put in a workaround (install python2 and patch their $PATH) just to run the test suite. Off the top of my head I know this includes Ubuntu
2011 Feb 28
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM IR Type System Rewrite
On Feb 28, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > This looks like a good extension to the type system. One thing that I > expected to work (when I first tried using opaque types) was for the > optimization passes and verification to operate correctly when using > opaque types, while the type could be made concrete later on - after > optimization. This turned out to be
2017 Jul 15
2
failing to optimize boolean ops on cmps
On 07/14/2017 11:46 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On 07/14/2017 01:38 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> >> >> Not sure about this last part. It is really going to require work >> by us to rewrite things. :-) In the mean time, I think we should >> go ahead with this. >> >> >> FWIW: My problem is, when put in this framework,
2020 Jul 07
2
RFC: Introducing CfgTraits and type-erased CfgInterface / CfgBlockRef / CfgValueRef
Hi Jakub, On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:25 AM Jakub (Kuba) Kuderski <kubakuderski at gmail.com> wrote: > There's a lot of heavily templated code in generic DomTee construction/updater, MemSSA updater, and GraphDiff that has become really hard to modify. For the context, Alina (cc'd) was recently looking into making the domtree code work with 'CFG views'; the basic idea is to
2017 Jun 09
2
Subclassing LLVM Type
On 9 June 2017 at 15:29, Jajoo, Malhar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for that , I have read the documentation on this , but I would like to know > if it would be the right thing to do , ie , changing the enum within llvm::Type Well, I find the idea of a non-canonical DummyType slightly disturbing (I don't think it's something we'd ever support
2009 Feb 24
3
Free SMS limit (using sms_fu)
I have been using SMS_fu but it seems too good to be true for production. I''m wondering, is there any sort of limit on email to sms depending on the carrier that you can send in a given amount of time? I remember reading somewhere that there is a limit to the number of free email to sms that you can send through AT&T in a given month. Does anyone know anything aobut this? I guess I
2016 Jun 05
3
Doubts
Hello sir, I'm having some problems understading how llvm works. I'm following a concrete example and visualizing the DAG and the .s output and some stuff doesn´t seem to match. I sorry to bother you but I don´t know where I can expose my doubts and I wonder if you could redirect me to some discussion place where someone might help me. Thanks, Patosga