search for: conclusively

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

Hello ppl, Searched all over, but couldn't find anything conclusive. Does an off-the-shelf version of Asterisk run without any issues on a 64-bit machine? Does anyone have any 'conclusive' figures? Apologies if this is a repeat question. Would appreciate if I could be redirected to the appropriate link. cheerz - Ben. EMAIL DISCLAIMER : This email and any files transmitted with it

The myoglobin sequence, with reference number NM_005368 in Gen bank, has the following frequencies of DNA nucleotides: A C G T 237 278 309 242 Do these data provide sufficient evidence, at the 1% level of significance, that the DNA nucleotides have an unequal distribution, that is the DNA nucleotides are not evenly utilised? Clearly state your hypothesis, test statistic and conclusion.

Conclusion: DO NOT USE SOFTWARE RAID-1 WITH EXT3 I've started with this conclusion cause i am positive that raid-1 and ext3 are causing data corruption. I've upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2 and from the first date i run into data corruption problems @ least once per day (i was monitoring once per day only) after 7 days we bought a brand new server cause the previous was very old and i thought

| |> By the way: At this point I have not recieved my own question. | | That might be because the subject has acquired 'AW:' as a prefix. If | you sort by subject, it comes a long way down the list. No I just wanted to show my lag. My conclusion is, that there are definetly some people here that are not able to connect to a (fast) newsgroup server. I did not see that problem. The

Dear All, I have two samples as the following: conjps<-c(9.41,10.45,10.78,10.73,11.11,11.12,11.59,11.04,11.63) ms<-c(4.11,5.10,5.70,6.46,6.04,6.16, 6.24,6.32,7.33) I want to test the change of sample is same to the another one. conjps_ch<-c(1.04,0.33.....) ms<-c(0.99,0.60,0.76....) which test I should use, which conclusion can we drive based on the test? I used the following

I haven't heard any more comments on this, and R 2.3.0 is almost here, so I'll bring this thread to a close. I have changed the default theme to the old PDF default for all devices (except postscript, which still defaults to color=FALSE) in the latest lattice (part of R-alpha now). It's easy enough to get the old defaults back, instructions are given in ?trellis.device. Deepayan

I've solved my problem using: (purpose: write the signed integer -19 as a two byte integer into a binary file) writeBin(as.integer(-19),myconnection, size=2) There is no need to coerce. Thanks anyway! Luca NanettiUniversity Medical Center Groningen BCN-NeuroImagingCenter A.Deusinglaan 2 9713AW Groningen The Nethterlands l dot nanetti at med dot rug dot nl

Hi list, I've just figured it out. When we're installing the drivers from adobe there's a part where we must "Select the Printer Model". By default it uses the "Generic Postscript Printer" (it has an associated PPD for that). We must get a PPD for our printer (installed on the linux server) from the www.linuxprinting.org, click the "Browse" button and

Report by Eric Lindblad 14-09-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com cf: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/9880 The 'gmake check' compile error on xapian-core-1.2.21/tests/api_backend.cc was resolved by the modification (at the suggestion of a mailing-list member) of the offending string from "q.OP_PHRASE" to "Xapian::Query::OP_PHRASE".

Motivation At the moment, when targeting armv7a, clang defaults to generate code as if -mcpu=cortex-a8 was specified. When targeting armv8a, it defaults to generate code as if -mcpu=cortex-a53 was specified. This leads to surprising code generation, by the compiler optimizing for a specific micro-architecture, whereas the intent from the user was probably to generate code that is

Am 27.08.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 27/08/15 11:51, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 27.08.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> Well, I don't think I will ever be able to help you with firewalld, it >>> sounds like it has something to with systemd and I will never use that >>> abortion, I may have to start using freebsd. >>

This is a hot topic in the compiler research community, but the focus there is on (a) choosing the right optimization sequences internally and transparently, rather than through combinations of options, (b) performance prediction techniques so you don't actually have to run gazillion different choices, and perhaps can even avoid the problem of choosing representative inputs, as you talked

This is one long letter about T.38 and Asterisk. I hope it will help me, and lots of other Asterisk users to understand some T.38 problems with Asterisk. This is my situation: I have Panasonic DX600 FAX machine. It's connected to Asterisk 1.2.13 thru ATA adapter (I have used both, Cisco 186 and Grandstream HandyTone 386). Asterisk is connected with my SIP provider. That link that my provider

I'm cross-posting the message below (from GCC list) because I believe it would (at some point) be very beneficial to build an evolutionary optimization pass into LLVM. The idea would be to discover the perfect set of optimizations for a given program by trying them all and analyzing the execution times of each. This would be somewhat like profile driven optimization except the profile is

Hi There, Using t.test to test hypothesis about which one is greater, A or B? where A={10,20,30},B={25,30,15}. My question is which of the following conclusions is right? #################hypothesis testing 1 h0: A greater than or equal to B h1: A less than B below is splus code A=c(10,20,30) B=c(25,30,15) t.test(c(10,20,30),c(25,30,15),alternative="less") output: p-value=0.3359

Dear folks, To me suspend and resume is not a fancy feature. It is a must have like all the other conveniences and simplicity that scp provides. I agree with Damien that this will cause multiple protocol versions to float around, but we can't make omelettes without breaking eggs. The question is how important is this feature? I would say it is very basic compared to other fancy features

On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 15:11, Vikram Adve wrote: > This is a hot topic in the compiler research community, but the focus > there is on > (a) choosing the right optimization sequences internally and > transparently, rather than through combinations of options, > (b) performance prediction techniques so you don't actually have to run > gazillion different choices, and perhaps

On 08/07/2013 03:52 PM, Michele Scandale wrote: > > In the opencl specification is said that the four address spaces are > disjoint, so my conclusion of non aliasing with the others. In OpenCL 2.0, you can cast between the generic address space and global/local/private, so there's also that to consider.

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).