search for: conclusions

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0....

...ith it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official business of Mascon shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by Mascon. Any information contained in this email, when addressed to Mascon clients is subject to the terms and conditions in governing client contract. Whi...

The myoglobin sequence, with reference number NM_005368 in Gen bank, has the following frequencies of DNA nucleotides: A C G T 237 278 309 242 Do these data provide sufficient evidence, at the 1% level of significance, that the DNA nucleotides have an unequal distribution, that is the DNA nucleotides are not evenly utilised? Clearly state your hypothesis, test statistic and conclusion.

Conclusion: DO NOT USE SOFTWARE RAID-1 WITH EXT3 I've started with this conclusion cause i am positive that raid-1 and ext3 are causing data corruption. I've upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2 and from the first date i run into data corruption problems @ least once per day (i was monitoring once per day only) after 7 days we bought a brand new server cause the previous was very old and i thought

| |> By the way: At this point I have not recieved my own question. | | That might be because the subject has acquired 'AW:' as a prefix. If | you sort by subject, it comes a long way down the list. No I just wanted to show my lag. My conclusion is, that there are definetly some people here that are not able to connect to a (fast) newsgroup server. I did not see that problem. The

Dear All, I have two samples as the following: conjps<-c(9.41,10.45,10.78,10.73,11.11,11.12,11.59,11.04,11.63) ms<-c(4.11,5.10,5.70,6.46,6.04,6.16, 6.24,6.32,7.33) I want to test the change of sample is same to the another one. conjps_ch<-c(1.04,0.33.....) ms<-c(0.99,0.60,0.76....) which test I should use, which conclusion can we drive based on the test? I used the following

I haven't heard any more comments on this, and R 2.3.0 is almost here, so I'll bring this thread to a close. I have changed the default theme to the old PDF default for all devices (except postscript, which still defaults to color=FALSE) in the latest lattice (part of R-alpha now). It's easy enough to get the old defaults back, instructions are given in ?trellis.device. Deepayan

I've solved my problem using: (purpose: write the signed integer -19 as a two byte integer into a binary file) writeBin(as.integer(-19),myconnection, size=2) There is no need to coerce. Thanks anyway! Luca NanettiUniversity Medical Center Groningen BCN-NeuroImagingCenter A.Deusinglaan 2 9713AW Groningen The Nethterlands l dot nanetti at med dot rug dot nl

Hi list, I've just figured it out. When we're installing the drivers from adobe there's a part where we must "Select the Printer Model". By default it uses the "Generic Postscript Printer" (it has an associated PPD for that). We must get a PPD for our printer (installed on the linux server) from the www.linuxprinting.org, click the "Browse" button and

Report by Eric Lindblad 14-09-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com cf: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/9880 The 'gmake check' compile error on xapian-core-1.2.21/tests/api_backend.cc was resolved by the modification (at the suggestion of a mailing-list member) of the offending string from "q.OP_PHRASE" to "Xapian::Query::OP_PHRASE".

...0.09% (up from -0.12%) Cortex-A72: 0.20% (up from 0.03%) Conclusion: for all the in-order and out-of-order cores I measured, it's beneficial to get the instructions scheduled using the Cortex-A8 pipeline model in combination with -mcpu=generic. Taking into account the above measurements, my conclusions are: 1. We should make -mcpu=generic the default cpu, not Cortex-A8 or Cortex-A53 for march=armv7a and march=armv8a. 2. We probably want to let the compiler schedule instructions using the Cortex-A8 pipeline model for -mcpu=generic, since it gives a bit of speedup on all cores tested. Do people ag...

...tating my preference on the subject, I do not use > firewalld but understand it comes out of the same stable as systemd, > namely red-hat, so it is a reasonable assumption to conclude it has > something to do with systemd no it is *not* a reasonable conclusion (and there is no reason for conclusions when 5 seconds Goolge brings facts) and if you take away all code from Redhat on sevral upstream projects running on your machines you would miss a lot > if this is not the case, then for this I > apologise, but I will not apologise for hating systemd and I will not > stop saying I will...

...mention it so it can be tucked away in the "think about this later" > file. > > Reid. > > -----Forwarded Message----- >> From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch.com> >> To: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc.gnu.org> >> Subject: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis >> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:11:55 -0500 >> >> For those who haven't the time to read my full article, I thought I'd >> pass along the conclusions section. One of my goals with Acovea was to >> provide some empirical evidence of how o...

This is one long letter about T.38 and Asterisk. I hope it will help me, and lots of other Asterisk users to understand some T.38 problems with Asterisk. This is my situation: I have Panasonic DX600 FAX machine. It's connected to Asterisk 1.2.13 thru ATA adapter (I have used both, Cisco 186 and Grandstream HandyTone 386). Asterisk is connected with my SIP provider. That link that my provider

...ng like this, but I thought I'd mention it so it can be tucked away in the "think about this later" file. Reid. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch.com> > To: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc.gnu.org> > Subject: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:11:55 -0500 > > For those who haven't the time to read my full article, I thought I'd > pass along the conclusions section. One of my goals with Acovea was to > provide some empirical evidence of how optimizations beha...

Hi There, Using t.test to test hypothesis about which one is greater, A or B? where A={10,20,30},B={25,30,15}. My question is which of the following conclusions is right? #################hypothesis testing 1 h0: A greater than or equal to B h1: A less than B below is splus code A=c(10,20,30) B=c(25,30,15) t.test(c(10,20,30),c(25,30,15),alternative="less") output: p-value=0.3359 because p-value is not less than alpha (0.05), we cannot reject...

Dear folks, To me suspend and resume is not a fancy feature. It is a must have like all the other conveniences and simplicity that scp provides. I agree with Damien that this will cause multiple protocol versions to float around, but we can't make omelettes without breaking eggs. The question is how important is this feature? I would say it is very basic compared to other fancy features

...the "think about this later" > > file. > > > > Reid. > > > > -----Forwarded Message----- > >> From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch.com> > >> To: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc.gnu.org> > >> Subject: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis > >> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:11:55 -0500 > >> > >> For those who haven't the time to read my full article, I thought I'd > >> pass along the conclusions section. One of my goals with Acovea was to > >> provide some em...

On 08/07/2013 03:52 PM, Michele Scandale wrote: > > In the opencl specification is said that the four address spaces are > disjoint, so my conclusion of non aliasing with the others. In OpenCL 2.0, you can cast between the generic address space and global/local/private, so there's also that to consider.

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch &gt...