search for: conciser

Hi, Is there a concise/ruby way to do the following: [Note: 1 and 2 below are not related.] (1) for p in 0...@order.line_items[k].shipment_lines.length shipline_qty = shipline_qty + @order.line_items[k].shipment_lines[p].quantity end (2) ts = Array.new for tk in s.trackings ts.push(tk) end

Hi, I know this is a little bit offtopic on this list. But I can't find a more appropriate forum that I can ask. If there is a high quality forum on statistics textbook discussion, please let me know. I am reading Applied Linear Statistical Models. One drawback that I feel about this book is that it discuss many examples, which is to distracting. Numbers are give in those examples. Comments

Hello, Can anyone tell me the format for meetme list concise command, so that I know what field is what (separated by '!'s) Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130815/eba161be/attachment.htm>

Hi there, Just a small suggestion : The following apis could be a bit more concise / shorter / pleasant I thought. This is particularly difficult, my brain stumbles on this each time when scanning thorugh the code :) set_no_auto_load(true) Could it be two apis instead? auto_load no_auto_load and the other one : worker_name :important_worker (no set_ prefix) thanks, emil

Thanks for the previous tips and suggestions. Here's a more concise example: Input file: <aaaa> <bbbb> <cccc> <dddd> I want everything on one line, i.e., remove all newlines. Like so: <aaaa><bbbb><cccc><dddd> Simple perl code: #!/usr/bin/env perl # Remove newlines from a file in two ways: # (1) Just "chomp" them; # (2) Replace

I am getting a priveldged command error on the manager API. 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Action: Login 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Username: XXX 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Secret: ZZZZ 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Events: off 16-Feb-09 11:51 am DEBUG: Response: Success[CR ][LF ]Message: Authentication accepted[CR ][LF ][CR ][LF ] 16-Feb-09 11:51 am

Hi, I have one question on expand.grid() function. When I write following syntax :expand.grid(c("u", "l"), c("u", "l"), c("u", "l")) I get following as desired : Var1 Var2 Var3 1 u u u 2 l u u 3 u l u 4 l l u 5 u u l 6 l u l 7 u l l 8 l l l However

def edit @item = Item.find(params[:id]) redirect_to :action=>:list if (request.post? and @item.update_attributes(params[:item])) end I could probably condense it into one line (something like ...and(@item=Item.update...)), but I''ll probably actually use: def edit @item = Item.find(params[:id]) if request.post? and @item.update_attributes(params[:item]) flash[:notice]

I like the concise version of stubs available on true mocks: => #<Mock:0x32f76d4> >> foo.stubs(:one => ''hi'', :two => ''again'') => {:one=>"hi", :two=>"again"} Why can''t we do it on ''real'' objects? >> foo = Object.new >> foo.stubs(:method1 => ''a'',

Hi, In voicemail.conf: ; Supported values: ; 'filename' filename of a soundfile (single ticks around the filename ; required) ; ${VAR} variable substitution ; A or a Day of week (Saturday, Sunday, ...) ; B or b or h Month name (January, February, ...) ; d or e numeric day of month (first, second, ..., thirty-first) ; Y Year ; I or l

2008/12/9 Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> > > > 2008/12/9 Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> > > On Tuesday 09 December 2008 09:14:11 Olivier wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > In voicemail.conf: >> > ; Supported values: >> > ; 'filename' filename of a soundfile (single ticks around the >>

Is there any doccumentation on using the ldapsam_nua backend?? I would like to setup my server in that fashion, and have looked all through the docs tree I downloaded with the cvs sources without sucess. The LDAP howto in the docs tree is completly useless as it was written for 2.2.3

Full_Name: Neil Tiffin Version: R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26) OS: [R.app GUI 1.30 (5511) i386-apple-darwin9.8.0] Submission from: (NULL) (99.68.31.116) In the help section 'INSTALL {utils}' half way down the page the line Use R CMD INSTALL ?help for concise usage information, including all the available options should have two '-' in front of help. Therefor it should read

>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 16:54:46 -0700 writes: > Hi, > On 05/15/2017 10:41 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: >> This is getting pretty convoluted. >> >> The current behavior is consistent with the description at the top of >> the help page -- it does not

Dear R people, I have a simple question to ask. Suppose I have a data.frame with two variables: one factor (x) and one numeric (y), I want to calculate the mean of y for each value of x. Although it's easy to do it within a for a loop, I believe there may be a concise way by using some kinds of "apply" functions. Could anyone tell me how to do that? Thank you. Frank

Hi All, Renato wrote: >As they say: if it's not broken, don't fix it. >Let's talk about the reductions that AVX512 and SVE can't handle with IR semantics, but let's not change the current IR semantics for no reason. Main problem for SVE: We can't write straight-line IR instruction sequence for reduction last value compute, without knowing #elements in vector to

That seems mostly reasonable. I'd try to make it more concise, though. The coding standards and developer policy docs should be short. +Commit message +-------------- + +Although we don't enforce the format of commit messages, there are general +guidelines that will help review, search in logs, email formatting and so on. +Mostly, the rules that apply are similar to other git

This is getting pretty convoluted. The current behavior is consistent with the description at the top of the help page -- it does not promise to stop evaluation once the first non-TRUE is found. That seems OK to me -- if you want sequencing you can use stopifnot(A) stopifnot(B) or stopifnot(A && B) I could see an argument for a change that in the multiple argumetn case reports _all_

Hi, On 05/15/2017 10:41 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: > This is getting pretty convoluted. > > The current behavior is consistent with the description at the top of > the help page -- it does not promise to stop evaluation once the first > non-TRUE is found. That seems OK to me -- if you want sequencing you > can use > > stopifnot(A) > stopifnot(B) > > or

Hi Damien, Damien Miller wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:04:41PM +1000: > ok, djm@ Thanks for checking, and thanks to Val and Michael for testing. I just committed the patch to OpenBSD, others will likely take care of merging it to -portable. > (I'd prefer the comment before the return statement, but up to you) Immediately before the return statement, it looked really confusing,