Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "con_destroy".
Did you mean:
on_destroy
2012 Jan 06
0
interesting connection / finalizer bug?
...== by 0x4F5F159: R_ReplConsole (main.c:305)
==14875== by 0x4F607B8: run_Rmainloop (main.c:986)
==14875== Address 0x907f1d8 is 136 bytes inside a block of size 448 free'd
==14875== at 0x4C25F7B: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==14875== by 0x4EB0282: con_destroy (connections.c:3086)
==14875== by 0x4EB03B3: do_close (connections.c:3105)
==14875== by 0x4F795E4: do_internal (names.c:1236)
==14875== by 0x4F15F63: Rf_eval (eval.c:471)
==14875== by 0x4F19D7F: Rf_evalList (eval.c:1840)
==
A little more revealing, with two surprises noted, is
> f...