Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "computerish".
Did you mean:
computer's
2004 Aug 06
3
de-essing into speex?
...sounds, repeated 10 times or so, just to get
some file size so file size comparison makes sense.
one may argue on which compression the ess sounds become
acceptable. after listening MANY times between the original and the
spx file, i decided that going under quality 9 means you start to hear
"computerish" ess sounds.
as for the speex VS windows media encoder issue, compare speex quality
2 with the wma file. they are equally sized and should therefore be of
equal quality, but in my ears the wma file is quite a lot better. it
may have less treble, but the spx file sounds very synthetic.
note:...
2004 Aug 06
0
de-essing into speex?
...o, just to get
> some file size so file size comparison makes sense.
>
> one may argue on which compression the ess sounds become
> acceptable. after listening MANY times between the original and the
> spx file, i decided that going under quality 9 means you start to hear
> "computerish" ess sounds.
>
> as for the speex VS windows media encoder issue, compare speex quality
> 2 with the wma file. they are equally sized and should therefore be of
> equal quality, but in my ears the wma file is quite a lot better. it
> may have less treble, but the spx file sound...
2004 Aug 06
2
de-essing into speex?
are there plans to add "de-essing" as part of the speexenc procedure,
to make it possible to use lower quality compression without getting
those horrible computer-like "ess" sounds in the finished result?
like if you say "someone said the sun is shining", there is a lot of
ess sounds, and these will sound "computer-ish" at vbr qualities below
9.
i know