search for: compunded

...getSymbols("GOOG",from="2011-11-01") GOOG1<-GOOG[,1] If i use my formula i get only the value "1" for every observation :( Thanks for your time and help! I appreciate it Regards Tonio -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Continuasly-Compunded-Returns-with-quantmod-data-tp4090014p4090014.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi !            I am new to R. Can somebody help me in reformatting huge output files ,i.e, rearranging sets of columns in specific order. For example: I have data for three compunds 1, 2 and 3 file1: ID CA1 CA3 CA2 MA2 MA1 MA3 1 14 15 13 7 12 3 2 19 7 12 10 14 5 3 21 12 19 6 8 9   to File 2:   ID CA1 CA2 CA3 MA1 MA2 MA3 1 14 13 15 12 7 3 2 19 12 7 14 10 5 3 21 19 12 8 6 9   or File3: ID

I have a data frame consisting of three columns(name of compund,ppm and frequency).Name contains string values .ppm and frequency contains numeric values with decimal points upto four digits. I have an excel sheet which is like a library.The first column contains the name of compounds and remaining column contains the ppm values of the compound which satisfy certain rules.The number of ppm values

Hi R experts, I am interested on the effects of two dietry compunds on the growth of chicks. Rather than extracting linear growth functions for each chick and using these in an analysis I thought using ReML might provide a neater and better way of doing this. (I have read the pdf vignette("MlmSoftRev") and "Fitting linear mixed models in R" by Douglas Bates but I am not

On 7/10/20 12:27 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:53:47PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >> The goal for this series is to introduce the hmm_pfn_to_map_order() >> function. This allows a device driver to know that a given 4K PFN is >> actually mapped by the CPU using a larger sized CPU page table entry and >> therefore the device driver can safely

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:53:47PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > The goal for this series is to introduce the hmm_pfn_to_map_order() > function. This allows a device driver to know that a given 4K PFN is > actually mapped by the CPU using a larger sized CPU page table entry and > therefore the device driver can safely map system memory using larger > device MMU PTEs. > The

dear list, I am wondering if one can find examples and/or more detailed descriptions of modifications needed when going beyond standard corStruct classes (i.e. those already provided for use in lme/nlme)? When I looked at pages 238-239 of Pinheiro/Bates (2000): Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus, I found that I would need a bit more explicit guidance what to do for implementing a new

I have been having problems with using scan(). I searched the archives and found someone with the same problem several years ago, but did not find a solution. I want to prompt the user for input, scan in that input, and then go on to use it as a variable. The simplest version of my program is cat("enter m","\n") m <- scan(n = 1, quiet = T) m If I enter these lines one

I am still a little unclear in the difference between randomized block design and two-way factorial design after consulting a few books, including John Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Both put observations in cells corresponding to two factors of many levels. Both use the same computer program to analyze data. It seems that randomized block design can have only one observation

The goal for this series is to introduce the hmm_pfn_to_map_order() function. This allows a device driver to know that a given 4K PFN is actually mapped by the CPU using a larger sized CPU page table entry and therefore the device driver can safely map system memory using larger device MMU PTEs. The series is based on 5.8.0-rc3 and is intended for Jason Gunthorpe's hmm tree. These were

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:34:39PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I'm looking at a CentOS 5 Xen server that I'd really like to put some >> more recent VM's. There are reasons not to touch it at the moment, so >> I can't upgrade it in place today. >> >> Has anyone

Hello, We would like to propose making LoopVectorize aware of SLP operations, to improve the generated code for loops operating on struct fields or doing complex math. At the moment, LoopVectorize uses interleaving to vectorize loops that operate on values loaded/stored from consecutive addresses: vector loads/stores are generated to combine consecutive loads/stores and then shufflevector

Hi Florian! This proposal sounds pretty exciting! Integrating SLP-aware loop vectorization (or the other way around) and SLP into the VPlan framework is definitely aligned with the long term vision and we would prefer this approach to the LoopReroll and InstCombine alternatives that you mentioned. We prefer a generic implementation that can handle complicated cases to something ad-hoc for some

The goal for this series is to introduce the hmm_range_fault() output array flags HMM_PFN_PMD and HMM_PFN_PUD. This allows a device driver to know that a given 4K PFN is actually mapped by the CPU using either a PMD sized or PUD sized CPU page table entry and therefore the device driver can safely map system memory using larger device MMU PTEs. The series is based on 5.8.0-rc3 and is intended for