search for: comprehensively

Below is code that introduces a list comprehension syntax into R, allowing expressions like: > .[ sin(x) ~ x <- (0:11)/11 ] [1] 0.00000000 0.09078392 0.18081808 0.26935891 0.35567516 0.43905397 [7] 0.51880673 0.59427479 0.66483486 0.72990422 0.78894546 0.84147098 > .[ .[x*y ~ x <- 0:3] ~ y <- 0:4] [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 0 0 0 0 0 [2,] 0 1 2

Dear RHelp-list, ?? I try to use the package comprehenr to replace a for loop by a list comprehension. ?I wrote the code but I certainly miss something because it is very slower compared to the for loops. May you please explain to me why the list comprehension is slower in my case. Here is my example. I do the calculation of the square difference between the values of two vectors vec1 and

Laurent, Thank you for introducing me to a package I did not know existed as I use features like list comprehension in python all the time and could see using it in R now that I know it is available. As to why you see your example as slow, I see you used a fairly complex and nested expression and wonder if it was a better way to go. As you are dealing with an interpreter doing delayed

This can be vectorized. Try ix <- seq_along(vec2) S_diff2 <- sapply(seq_len(N1-(N2-1)*ratio_sampling), \(j) sum((vec1[(ix-1)*ratio_sampling+j] - vec2[ix])**2)) On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 11:27?AM Laurent Rhelp <laurentRHelp at free.fr> wrote: > > Dear RHelp-list, > > I try to use the package comprehenr to replace a for loop by a list > comprehension. > > I

Dear all, my colleague (a statistician - not yet using R) aked me, if there is a R package comparable to the software "PASS" (Power Analysis and Sample Size Procedures), comprising about 150 procedures. I found the R package "pwr". Are there other (more comprehensive) power analysis packages? Many thanks! Udo

I would be more strong on this advice: learn to think in R, rather than thinking in Python, when programming in R. R has atomic vectors... Python does not (until you import a package that implements them). I find that while it is possible to import R thinking into Python, Python programmers seem to object for stylistic reasons even though such thinking speeds up Python also. A key step in that

Hi all, I'm looking for a package that will give me comprehensive set of descriptive statistics, including skew and kurtosis. Also, is there a similar package that will provide multivariate descriptive statistics as well? Thanks in advance, David -- =========================================================================== David Kaplan, Ph.D. Professor Department of Educational

Hello listmates, I know this may sound stupid... but I am trying to set up a firewall/filter/forwarder using CentOS 5.5 machine as a platform and I am succeeding but only partially. Fro example, I am literally trying to forward HTTP and HTTPS (TCP 80 and 443) from the public interface to a private IP and TCP 80 works like a charm whereas TCP 443 seems to be a no-go. To that effect: does anyone

Hello, I'm talking about re-writing the classicupgrade HowTo since over a year now. :-) Now, after three rainy vacation days, it's finaly done: A complete and comprehensive re-write of the classicupgrade HowTo: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Classic_Upgrade_%28NT4-style_domain_to_AD%29 Some other mentionable documentation changes, I had done during the last week: *

Good Afternoon, I have been looking for a comprehensive list of error codes that are returned by rsync for a script that I am writing. I have searched Ggoogle and Yahoo! and I have found out the following: 4 = action not supported 5 = wrong password 10 = socket IO error 11 = file IO error 12 = broken connection 23 = file(s) couldn't be transferred 255 = unspecified error Is there anywhere

I fully agree with Jeff that the best way to use ANY language is to evaluate the language in terms of not just the capabilities it offers but also the philosophy behind what it was created for and how people do things and just grok it and use it mostly in the way intended. I do that with all the languages I learn, whether for computers or humans. Bringing in something you like from another

I would like to have a smart cli tool, that shows a comprehensive list about the local storage structure: An output like: /srv /dev/mapper/luks-f85b7a2c-...: UUID="ca924fad-..." TYPE="ext4" /dev/mapper/vg_internal_e-lv_internal_srv: UUID="f85b7a2c-..." TYPE="crypto_LUKS" vg_internal_e /dev/md3: UUID="1Fi2Ex-..."

Welcome to R/ R-PLUS Webminar Series. R-PLUS 3.3 Rocks: Interactive, Comprehensible and Highly Visual. http://www.xlsolutions-corp.com/webminar.asp. March 12th @ 12PM ET (USA Time) Increase your productivity with R-PLUS 3.3 by attending the webminar and learning how to: 1. Interactively clicking your way through your favorite statisticals models without the need of programming. 2. Use

how to make this work, its seem to me that netfilter is changed more or less someplaces that shorewall do not support, using 4.4.27 shorewall and shorewall6 suggestion welcomed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99!

Try *lsblk -f* *[root at david ~]# lsblk -f NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT sda ??sda1 LVM2_member DWnNT0-aHQK-4zxn-cWIL-4iAQ-fboe-QaeyOK ??vg_Backups-Backups ext4 Backups 97baf04c-5dbb-43bd-9e56-b1c23e623ae4 /media/Backups sdb ??sdb1 ext4 boot 7186c3bc-ef06-4d34-9caf-3813ec004fbb

Hi all, sorry for being OT but would any of you recommend a ticketing system? We'd like something pretty comprehensive to cover helpdesk and HR stuff as well as software bugs/requests. There seems to be a million variations out there.

Just wondering, what exactly is supported/suggested: I need a comprehensive desktop search functionality. Not only searching for file names but also for content and meta data. The environment is EL6.8 / Gnome2. I have noticed that "beagle" is not part of the distro anymore. Any suggestions for such requirement? Thanks! LF

Hi, There is a typo in $LLVM_SRC/Makefile.rules on line 750 where it says : SharedLibKindMessage := "Lodable Module" instead of SharedLibKindMessage := "Loadable Module" Op 15-nov-06, om 15:54 heeft Bram Adams het volgende geschreven: > Didn't check > LLVM's test suite. Doing the simple LLVM-tests (on Slackware 10.2) gets: === Summary ===

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 12:55:58PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > A GNU make-ism - but you already mention requiring GNU make in > README. Should we make ./configure error out hard if $MAKE is not > GNU Make, rather than risking someone getting 80% though a build on > BSD make and then choking when it gets here? Yes that would be a good idea as a separate patch. I'm always annoyed