Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "compoil".
Did you mean:
compil
2016 Oct 17
3
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
...s with many old
> compilers, and they build that one first, then use that one to build
> the required libraries, tools, and the complete compiler, than use the
> complete compiler to bootstrap.
This is not correct :)
First stage of gcc is the entire compiler, not a subset or a different
compoiler.
You can also have cross-bootstrap, or
> Canadian cross, which increase the complexity of the builds by a
> reasonable margin.
>
> LLVM doesn't do that because we rely on the system's libraries, which
> honestly is a bad habit. This bad habit made the edges between RT,
&...
2016 Oct 17
2
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 19:44, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> > First stage of gcc is the entire compiler, not a subset or a different
> > compoiler.
>
> I didn't mean a different compiler, just not a full "toolchain".
>
Ah.
You said "GCC has a reduced sub-set of the compiler that works with many old
compiler".
This is the part i meant is not correct anymore. It does not have a reduced
subset.
This was kind...
2016 Oct 17
4
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
Just for the interest of discussion, I find it completely weird and
interesting that GCC needs to build itself 3 times to fully bootstrap. Has
there been any interest in looking at a single compile build? I don't
exactly know the limitations, but my naive thinking is that C++14 compiler
source parsed by C++14 capable compiler and codegen'd to C99 (or older)
source should make it compilable