search for: compnerd

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 159 matches for "compnerd".

Did you mean: compared
2014 Jun 23
4
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saleem, >> >> Though a simple app works great I am facing few issues trying to link a >> slightly complex object file, generated via LLVM, with so...
2015 Apr 24
3
[LLVMdev] unwind move *NOW*
Greetings, As previously mentioned, the unwind contents are going to be moved today. Im working on this now. If you could please hold off any commits to the Unwind part of things, it would be greatly appreciated. See you on the new layout! -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150424/0848b094/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > >> Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? >> > > Sure, but what is the default unwinder for a given platform? > > Lets go...
2015 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? >>> >> >> Sure, but what is the default unwinder for a...
2015 Apr 22
4
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 April 2015 at 03:40, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: >> So after a bit of a hiatus (sorry, other stuff has been eating up my free >> time), Id like to pick this up again. I think that its a matter of just >> copying the unwind sources into the right place. Im hoping to do this >> sometime this Frid...
2014 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
...a .o file directly. I'm not experienced with it myself but I've heard that MSVC will produce assembly that it can't parse, so it's probably a good idea to leave assembly out of the equation when targeting Windows. Nick On 08-Jun-2014, at 11:00 am, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org<mailto:compnerd at compnerd.org> <mailto:compnerd at compnerd.org>> wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca<mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca> <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: Damanjit Singh wrote: Hi guys,...
2015 Feb 05
3
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
...ot against the idea, if anyone feels > strongly about it. > > If all of us could agree to a common solution, and make sure all > interested parties are in, we should do the move before 3.7. > > Please, cast your votes. > > cheers, > --renato > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150204/0140584d/attachment.html>
2014 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
...really use clang to generate the object file and the current steps won't work? I ask because using .c file was only an illustration. For my project the IR is not generated from .c files or clang. Thanks, Daman Sent from my phone On 08-Jun-2014, at 11:00 am, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org<mailto:compnerd at compnerd.org>> wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca<mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: Damanjit Singh wrote: Hi guys, Would really appreciate any help here. Thanks, Daman From: Damanjit Singh <dsingh a...
2015 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On 30 Jan 2015 21:24, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > The library is agnostic of the unwinder, the driver is who cares (as it needs to generate the linker invocation). I think that adding a flag to control that similar to -rtlib is probably what we may have to do then. What about the default unwinder for Compiler-RT?...
2014 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++11 reverse iterators (was C++11 is here)
...e here, but I think that a > global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a > standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python. I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with it a bit, and came up with https://gist.github.com/compnerd/5694186 a while back. > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part ------------...
2015 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> What about the default unwinder for Compiler-RT? Should we assume our >> own? Gcc's? Assuming nothing will break compilation, since the libraries &gt...
2014 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-RT] [ARM] Where __aeabi_[il]div0 builtins should be implemented?
...i, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com > wrote: > Sergey, > > Not that it'll save you much hassle, but here's an implementation of > __aeabi_idiv0 and __aeabi_ldiv0 that I've been sitting on for a while. > > I vaguely remember compnerd suggesting that I don't commit them to > compiler_rt, but I don't remember why. > I did dig into this further and it seems that they are, in fact, considered part of the RT-ABI :-(. Ive committed a simple conforming implementation in SVN r217322. > > Cheers, > > Jon &g...
2014 Jun 09
2
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
...perienced with it >myself but I've heard that MSVC will produce assembly that it can't >parse, so it's probably a good idea to leave assembly out of the >equation when targeting Windows. > >Nick > >> On 08-Jun-2014, at 11:00 am, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org >> <mailto:compnerd at compnerd.org>> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca >>> <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: >>> >>> Damanjit Singh wrote: >>> >>&g...
2018 Jan 04
1
Linker Option support for ELF
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> There was some interest from a number of a few people about adding >> support for embedded linker options to ELF. This would be an extension >> that requires linker support to actually work, but has significant...
2014 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-RT] [ARM] Where __aeabi_[il]div0 builtins should be implemented?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 9 September 2014 02:18, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> > wrote: > > The current implementations actually return 0. Can you point out where > that > > doesn't hold please? > > With the current implementation... > > int foo(int a) { > return __aeabi_idiv0(a); > } > > returns 'a'...
2014 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-RT] [ARM] Where __aeabi_[il]div0 builtins should be implemented?
...ldiv0(long long return_value); The *div0 functions: 􏰁 Return the value passed to them as a parameter. Is my copy out of date? > > Why 0 and not infinity? Or some other value? > > Because 0 is what it was before. > > cheers, > --renato > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140908/c55283f0/attachment.html>
2014 Oct 05
6
[LLVMdev] lld coding style
...se. However, having a single uniform style across the projects reduces the barrier to entry, encouraging more developers to work on various projects across the set. So with that in mind, I would like to ask, would it be possible to consider switching to LLVM style for lld? -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141004/541c7be1/attachment.html>
2018 Jan 04
8
Linker Option support for ELF
...ons are pushed into a custom section, and a secondary program is used to extract the options from this section prior to the linker being invoked. This adds a lot of complexity to the driver as well as additional tools being invoked in the build chain slowing down the build. -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180103/3f4e92db/attachment.html>
2014 Sep 17
4
[LLVMdev] proposal to avoid zlib dependency.
...tp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140916/85fcc53a/attachment.html>
2019 Oct 31
3
llvm-config --cxxflags should report C++ language standard version
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:46 AM Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:17 PM Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Since 2724d9e12960cc1d93eeabbfc9aa1bffffa041cc, llvm-config -cxxflags >> no longer reports the C++ language standard version (e.g. &quo...