search for: compliants

I'm checking back in to see if samba is FIPS compliant, as in using FIPS compliant algorithms ? Can it be built with openssl, which is FIPS compliant ? We're currently running 4.7.5. Please let me know. Regards, Mike

Thanks for the quick reply Jeremy. We have other FIPS compliant libraries, which check for, and ensure the proper FIPS compliant algorithms are used. Is there a link option to specify this kind of library ? ~ Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 2:08 PM To: Tompkins, Michael <Michael.Tompkins at xerox.com> Cc:

So....apparently I have some messages which are not RFC compliant sitting in my mailboxes (mostly older ones), and I have some software which is refusing to handle such messages. 1. Does anyone know of a nice way to verify that all my messages are compliant/find those that aren't? (I suppose I could use the existing failing software, but I was hoping for something a little more robust...) 2.

Is samba FIPS compliant ? If so, does it need to use SMB2/SMB3 to be FIPS compliant ? We do not use the Heimdal Kerberos libraries that can be compiled with the samba release. We are use samba 4.0.7. Regards, - Mike ?

On 11/2/2012 11:53 AM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > > I think Dan was making two points with his example. Dan, correct me if I misrepresent your example, but image a situation where a target has two instructions to choose between in order to perform the operation. The first is IEEE compliant, but the second isn't compliant in how it operates over NaNs (quiet or otherwise). For whatever

We are looking for a FastCGI protocol compliant RoR executable that can be used to host RoR in FastCGI mode. However, neither Ruby.exe nor Rubyw.exe appear to work with the FastCGI protocol (http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/fcgi-spec.html). Perhaps we are missing specific command line switches, or environment variables necessary to make this work. Any information much appreciated. Thanks,

Dear R-devel, Recently I ran into trouble installing two separate packages, nloptr and ncdf4, both due to the same issue: they have scripts that have the shebang `#! /bin/sh', but have bashisms in them, i.e. non-POSIX-compliant bash scripts. I use dash [1] as my shell environment, since it's about 4x as fast as bash. It looks like it's recently also become the default shell for

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>>>> > website (meaning, HP could test their firmware to be compatible with > Syslinux and with non-Windows OSes). If the HP firmware could be made > (more) compliant with UEFI specs, or if it could be improved and still > be compliant with UEFI specs, wouldn't

Hi Folks, I recently received a complaint regarding the vsFTP server I'm running on a CentOS 4.x box. The complaint was that it is improperly responding to the LIST command - it is not returning hidden (period prefixed) files in the directory listing. I investigated and found that vsFTPd would only return hidden files in the directory listing when it received the command "LIST

On 11/1/2012 6:38 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com > <mailto:dan433584 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> If the "optimizer" may truly ignore the possibility of NaNs under the >> N flag, this would seem to be ok. However, a trap is outside the >> boundaries of "undefined result".

On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 11/1/2012 6:38 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote: >> >> On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com >> <mailto:dan433584 at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> If the "optimizer" may truly ignore the possibility of NaNs under the

> > Today there are certain PCs i.e Elitebook 2560p, Elitebook 8460p that with > updated FW ""to the last known version"" cannot PXE boot syslinux for the > above mentioned reasons. > > We have already talked about this with Gene an there's an strategy for making > syslinux able to deal with these "weirdo" FWs. > It's just a matter

Hi, the configuration of my Dovecot 1.1.3 quota plugin looks like this: quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = *:messages=1337 this leads to the following GETQUOTAROOT response: 01 GETQUOTAROOT INBOX * QUOTAROOT "INBOX" "mbraun quota" * QUOTA "mbraun quota" (STORAGE 6553 1048576 MESSAGES 122 1337) 01 OK Getquotaroot completed. RFC2087

(Maybe this is a re-posting: sorry for that.) Hello, a SonicWALL appliance that protects my servers' LAN has suddenly begun to refuse OpenSSH connections with the following message: 'SSH 2.0 Overly Long Protocol Version Exchange String, SID: 3696, Priority: High - This signature detects overly long "Protocol Version Exchange" string in SSH 2.0. The maximum length of the

It seems we have a few email addresses that are not RFC 5322 compliant, and now that we've started using sieve these are failing. The problem is that we have a few addresses with leading, trailing or double dots in the local part: jan..frode at tanso.net .janfrode at tanso.net janfrode. at tanso.net I believe these has been working fine with everything else in dovecot (lda, lmtp, imap,

Hi, How do I make OpenSSH FIPS compliant? Will just compiling with OpenSSL version that is built with a FIPS validated module, make it FIPS compliant? I see sshd linked to both libcrypt and libcrypto. How do I make sure sshd runs only in FIPS mode? Appreciate any help. Thanks, Chandana

The Wine development release 1.1.43 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - A number of new icons. - Improved support for alpha channel in bitmaps. - Many Direct3D fixes and optimizations. - More complete msvcr80/90 implementations. - A wide range of 64-bit fixes. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

On 12 November 2015 at 21:29, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Etienne Dechamps wrote: >> According to an online NAT check service, around 50% of NATs in the >> wild have this problem, making this a very real issue: >> http://nattest.net.in.tum.de/results.php > > Are you referring to port restricted NAT in the

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 11/2/2012 11:53 AM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > >> >> >> I think Dan was making two points with his example. Dan, correct me if I >> misrepresent your example, but image a situation where a target has two >> instructions to choose between in order to perform the

asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com wrote: > Is there anyone else with the same problem? Yes, we've seen the same problem. We have found a work around, but I'm unable to to look into it today. -- Andreas Sikkema Rits tele.com Van Vollenhovenstraat 3 3016 BE Rotterdam t: +31 (0)10 2245544 f: +31 (0)10 2245540