search for: complaiing

http://advancedippipeline.com/60400413 "BOULDER, Colo. -- Leading Voice over IP service provider Vonage Holdings has complained to the Federal Communications Commission that competitors are blocking the use of its service, according to FCC chairman Michael Powell and others close to the company. "We're very actively on this case and we are taking it pretty seriously," said

..."poolalloc". After compilation finished, there are several dynamic libraries created (libpoolalloc_rt.so, libpoolalloc_fl_rt.so and LLVMDataStructure.so). I was not sure which one I should use so I just tried all of them with "opt -load". However, none of them seems to work (by complaiing "-poolalloc" is unknown). When I ran test in poolalloc directory, it gave me error complaining that "poolalloc.so" was missing. Am I missing anything here? BTW, when I run llvm test, is there a flag that can turn on option to print the test commands in details in addition to ju...

...gt; After compilation finished, there are several dynamic libraries > created (libpoolalloc_rt.so, libpoolalloc_fl_rt.so and > LLVMDataStructure.so). I was not sure which one I should use so I just > tried all of them with "opt -load". However, none of them seems to > work (by complaiing "-poolalloc" is unknown). When I ran test > in poolalloc directory, it gave me error complaining that > "poolalloc.so" was missing. > Am I missing anything here? > First, you need to make sure you load LLVMDataStructure.so and poolalloc.so into opt. You can speci...

...n finished, there are several dynamic libraries > > created (libpoolalloc_rt.so, libpoolalloc_fl_rt.so and > > LLVMDataStructure.so). I was not sure which one I should use so I just > > tried all of them with "opt -load". However, none of them seems to > > work (by complaiing "-poolalloc" is unknown). When I ran test > > in poolalloc directory, it gave me error complaining that > > "poolalloc.so" was missing. > > Am I missing anything here? > > > First, you need to make sure you load LLVMDataStructure.so and > poolalloc....

Hello there, It was working just fine for two hours. Last thing i did in winecfg was setting display to 32bit colors, maybe a bad idea since me laptop only supports 24bit but the progam i wanted to run complaied about display modes Now wine will not run any programs and even wincfg won't start. I get ~$ winecfg X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major

Yeah, I'd like to hear you guys' opinion instead of CleverNickName's! -----Original Message----- From: Luki [mailto:lugosoft@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:51 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Comments on Vonage SIP port blocking complai nts?? You can always visit Slashdot for countless (useless, well,

On 8/23/07, Wojciech Matyjewicz <wmatyjewicz at fastmail.fm> wrote: > Static ID fields in pass classes seem to be lacking definitions (there > were some changes in LLVM core classes and poolalloc hasn't been yet > fully updated to reflect them). The attached patch fixes this for DSA > classes - LLVMDataStructure.so loads into opt and DSA can be performed. Thanks. I forgot

Hi! Haifeng He wrote: > okay. I guess I figured it out. It seems "poolalloc" needs to be put > in llvm/projects/ directory. Yes, it will compile then. However, it seems the resulting shared library LLVMDataStructure.so (I haven't checked the others) has some undefined symbols. Trying to load it into the opt tool produces an error: undefined symbol:

mailboxes). Are you certain that removing either 612 or 610 mailbox would keep Asterisk from complaining ? > > However, the MWI does not indicate voice mails for 610 and I keep seeing > this error message: > > ERROR[2549]: app_voicemail.c:1630 messagecount: Couldn't find mailbox > 610 in context a10 > > However, mailbox 610 is clearly defined in voicemail.conf: >

...e yet; shouldn't it just do the right thing if it's -H mode and a file moves across directories but it still knows everyone's inode? I'm not sure.) I -think- I might be able to finesse this by actually physically rearranging the directories on the source---risky given that fsck is complaiing about it, but maybe... the idea would be to invert the organization so that every host is under a date (e.g., instead of hostA/date1, hostA/date2, etc, I make it date1/hostA, date1/hostB), and then I can specify a SINGLE dir (namely "date1") and not use -R. [I can't just specify a si...