search for: compilerrtdarwinutil

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "compilerrtdarwinutil".

Did you mean: compilerrtdarwinutils
2015 Jul 29
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...ial refactoring of the open source build system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are landed I can begin the more substantial rewor...
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...of the open source build system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. > > D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS > D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module > D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. > > One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are landed I can begin the more su...
2015 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...source build system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. >> >> D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS >> D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module >> D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. >> >> One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are landed I can begin...
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...ource build > system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I > have three remaining patches for that. > > D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS > D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new > CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module > D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the > operating system. > > One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this > functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once > these are landed I can beg...
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...ource build > system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I > have three remaining patches for that. > > D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS > D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new > CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module > D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the > operating system. > > One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this > functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once > these are landed I can beg...
2015 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...of the open source build system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. > > D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS > D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module > D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. > > One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are landed I can begin the more su...
2016 Apr 27
3
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
...ach we have because I think it has some serious problems, but an alternative solution would be to extend the Darwin approach to every other platform. If you do this you don't need ExternalProject, but you do need to do some really dirty hacks. If you want to understand those hacks, just look at CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake in compiler-rt. That is a bit of evil that I’m responsible for, and I’ll be paying down that debt for a long time to come. Apart from this we also have another problem. The build system makes configuration decisions based on the compiler *at configuration time*. The problem is you really wa...
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...ystem I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. > >> > >> D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS > >> D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module > >> D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. > >> > >> One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are lan...
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...tem I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I >> have three remaining patches for that. >> >> D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS >> D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new >> CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module >> D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the >> operating system. >> >> One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this >> functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once >> th...
2015 Jul 30
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...eed to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. >>>> >>>> D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS >>>> D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module >>>> D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. >>>> >>>> One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once thes...
2015 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Road map for CMake
...ial refactoring of the open source build system I need to bring it to feature parity with our internal system. I have three remaining patches for that. D11083 [CMake] Add experimental support for building compiler-rt for iOS D11082 [CMake] Adding some utility functions for Darwin builds into a new CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake module D11073 Architectures for darwin need to be conditionalized based on the operating system. One thing worth noting here. I need to land some variant of this functionality, but the way this is done is hacky and should go away. Once these are landed I can begin the more substantial rewor...
2016 Apr 27
7
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
...ach we have because I think it has some serious problems, but an alternative solution would be to extend the Darwin approach to every other platform. If you do this you don't need ExternalProject, but you do need to do some really dirty hacks. If you want to understand those hacks, just look at CompilerRTDarwinUtils.cmake in compiler-rt. That is a bit of evil that I’m responsible for, and I’ll be paying down that debt for a long time to come. > > Point taken, it is horrible. (sorry) > > >> Apart from this we also have another problem. The build system makes configuration decisions based o...
2016 Apr 27
3
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:54 AM Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 27 April 2016 at 15:39, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Yes. It is a move to put linux developers in the same position as > > windows and OS X ones, which is a *very* reasonable thing to do. > > Apart from the fact that neither
2016 Jul 13
2
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:48:51PM +0200, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote: > [ CCed all people who were involved in this thread ] > > Hi Tom, > > personally, I am interested to test the prebuilt-toolchains for > Ubuntu/xenial alias 16.04 LTS and Debian/Jessie v8.5.0 AMD64. > The available toolchains are incomplete and thus useless. > > Just as a fact: There is still no