search for: compiler_rt_has_fpic_flag

...BI info - done -- Detecting CXX compile features -- Detecting CXX compile features - done -- Found PythonInterp: /home/engshare/third-party2/python/2.7.5/centos6-native/da39a3e/bin/python2.7 (found version "2.7.5") -- Looking for unwind.h -- Looking for unwind.h - found -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT...

...g CXX compile features - done > > -- Found PythonInterp: > > /home/engshare/third-party2/python/2.7.5/centos6-native/da39a3e/bin/python2.7 > > (found version "2.7.5") > > -- Looking for unwind.h > > -- Looking for unwind.h - found > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUI...

...t;>> -- Found PythonInterp: >>> /home/engshare/third-party2/python/2.7.5/centos6-native/da39a3e/bin/ >>> python2.7 >>> (found version "2.7.5") >>> -- Looking for unwind.h >>> -- Looking for unwind.h - found >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER...

...me/engshare/third-party2/python/2.7.5/centos6-native/da39a3e/bin/ > > >>> python2.7 > > >>> (found version "2.7.5") > > >>> -- Looking for unwind.h > > >>> -- Looking for unwind.h - found > > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG...

...st CXX_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS - Success -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python (found version "2.7.3") -- Constructing LLVMBuild project information -- Targeting X86 -- Looking for unwind.h -- Looking for unwind.h - found -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT...

Hi, I'm trying to do a build and install on Windows 10 with Visual Studio 2015 Community Edition for the X86 and ARM targets, from the current release_40 branch. While compilation completes without error, the INSTALL target fails with the following error: 54> CMake Error at projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cmake_install.cmake:34 (file): 54> file INSTALL cannot find 54>

...orming Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_C11_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_C11_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT...

...orming Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_C11_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_C11_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT...

I had only a quick view on the blog-texts. It might be that a CLANG generated with LTO/PGO speeds up the build. Can you confirm this? Can you confirm binutils-gold speed up the build? Has LLVM an own linker? Can be used? Speedup the build? Yesterday night I loooked through available CMAKE/LLVM variables... ### GOLD # CMAKE_LINKER:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/ld #

...ng for __gcc_personality_v0 in gcc_s - found -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT...

Hello, Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit : > +Sylvestre who knows about these things. > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> L.S., >> >> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for >> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on

I am currently trying to compile a pretty simple program to work on an experimental board. It contains an (FPGA-version of) an ARMv4 processor. So basically, I try this (on my Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS): clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi -c barehello.c -o barehelloCLANG.o clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi -c io.c -o io.o clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi barehelloCLANG.o io.o -o helloCLANGstatic -static

...>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_...

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: [ brutal-snip ] ... > [ TODO#S: Before doing a 2nd build (and in a 3rd run using more > optimized binaries) ] > > How do I anable LTO via CMAKE? > > > LLVM_ENALBLE_LTO=On > [ v4 of my build-script attached ] Hi Chris, thanks for the response! That seems to work (see below). $ cd

...>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG >> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_...

...> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUI...

..._RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > >>> -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG > >>> --...

...v0 in gcc_s - found > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success >...

...v0 in gcc_s - found > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_NODEFAULTLIBS_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FFREESTANDING_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIC_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FPIE_FLAG - Success > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG > -- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_HAS_FNO_BUILTIN_FLAG - Success >...

Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: