search for: compiler_rt_binary_dir

...clang) allow us to put the >> '-L' parameters after the '-l' parameters. I made these changes locally and it went really well. The patch to clang is quite small and only one unit-test needed updating. In compiler-rt, I updated the flags passed to clang to include a '-L${COMPILER_RT_BINARY_DIR}/lib' and '-I${COMPILER_RT_BINARY_DIR}/include' flag. All tests pass except for the default blacklist tests. I had to move those into the clang test suite. As for cross-compilation and test ARM Linux, I needed to update all tests to include '%sim' before invoking cross-compile...

...#39; parameters after the '-l' parameters. >> >> I made these changes locally and it went really well. The patch to >> clang is quite small and only one unit-test needed updating. In >> compiler-rt, I updated the flags passed to clang to include a >> '-L${COMPILER_RT_BINARY_DIR}/lib' and >> '-I${COMPILER_RT_BINARY_DIR}/include' flag. All tests pass except for >> the default blacklist tests. I had to move those into the clang test >> suite. > > > I've looked at the patch to Clang. I'll try to explain why I'm opposed to &g...

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think it's a good idea to let user hijack > > the driver and stuff in custom version of > > ASan runtime instead the one installed/built > > with compiler :) > > I'm okay with it. This is open source. If someone wants to put the > sanitizers on a shorter