Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "compiler_rt_".
Did you mean:
compiler_rt
2016 Aug 26
2
[Progress Update] LLVM Runtimes Subdirectory
...ild the
> multiple targets for each runtime?
Yes, because it uses the just-built tools, clang is a dependency of the configure step.
>
> What's the CMake variable to enable RT for ARM, even though I'm
> running on x86_64?
This isn’t explicitly supported yet, but the standard COMPILER_RT_* prefixed options will be passed through.
>
>
>>> cmake ...
>>> ninja runtimes-configure
>>> ninja asan
>
> It does seem awkward. I don't know CMake well enough to know what's
> the problem, much less how to fix it, sorry. :(
>
> In pure...
2019 Sep 03
2
Struggling with a PGO build of clang -- llvm-profdata was built without zlib support?
Yes, that was it! Now that I took a closer look, the guide also states that
I should use the stage2 build. Silly me.
Thanks!
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 19:31, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> I /guess/ you actually want /path/to/release_build/llvm-profdata because
> the profiles are generated from binaries compiled with the release build,
> so it's the release build
2016 Aug 26
3
[Progress Update] LLVM Runtimes Subdirectory
Hi LLVM-Dev,
Over the past week or so I’ve been working on build system improvements around the LLVM runtimes directory. You may remember this from the LLVM-Dev discussion (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100859.html), or the patch review discussion (https://reviews.llvm.org/D20992) back in June.
Recently, I’ve made a handful of new changes that actually make it useful, and I