search for: compiled

...#39;: net_rpc.c:(.text+0xcbc8): undefined reference to `libnetapi_net_init' utils/net_rpc_shell.o:net_rpc_shell.c:(.text+0x51c): more undefined references to `libnetapi_net_init' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/net] Error 1 ? ---------------------------- ? Then I recompiled with the following parameters set: ? ./configure --enable-shared-libs=no --enable-external-libtalloc=no? --enable-external-libtdb=no --with-libtalloc=no --with-libtdb=no --with-libnetapi=no --with-libsmbclient =no --with-libsmbsharemodes=no --with-libaddns=no ? ? And then compile with the followi...

Hello! I failed to compile Samba with SSL on Mandrake 8.2 - error while "make all" in following sequence: cd SSLeay-0.9.0b ./Configure linux-elf make make install cd ../samba-2.2.7/source ./configure --with-ssl make clean make all Log of the last command attached. What's wrong? Please, help me! Thank you in advance. Pavel. -------------- next part -------------- Using FLAGS =

My sistem is Tru64 5.1 Alpha server 4100 Compiling smbd/dir.c Compiling smbd/password.c cc: Warning: smbd/password.c, line 1198: In this statement, the referenced type of the pointer value "name" is const, but the referenced type of the target of this assignment is not. (notconstqual) if (!message_named_mutex(name, 20)) { ---------------------------------^ Compiling smbd/conn.c

Hello, I am running Freebsd 4.5 on a alpha based server. I got the samba source from the cvs [ 2.2 branch ] and I am running into come make problems. I used ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-ssl --with-quota --with-cups and after that gets done i type in make and i get the following errors: alphatest# make Using FLAGS = -DHAVE_CRYPT_DECL -I/usr/local/ssl/include -O -I./popt -Iinclude

I'm receiving compiler warning messages using Solaris 2.8, Sun Workshop 6 C compiler and Samba 2.2.4. Can the warning be safely ingnored? Dennis 36 % make Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/openwin/share/include/X11/extensions -I/usr/openwin/include= -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOGFILEBASE="/usr/local/samba.22/var"

...y _NT_TARGET_VERSION SET TO WINXP Compiling - waitnopendinginstallevents\waitnopendinginstallevents.c Linking Executable - waitnopendinginstallevents\waitnopendinginstallevents\objchk_wxp_x86\i386\waitnopendinginstallevents.exe BUILD: Finish time: Fri Feb 15 12:18:03 2013 BUILD: Done 71 files compiled 2 libraries built 7 executables built Das System kann den angegebenen Pfad nicht finden. Das System kann den angegebenen Pfad nicht finden. SignTool Error: File not found: /t BUILD: Compile and Link for x86 BUILD: Start time: Fri Feb 15 12:18:04 2013 BUILD: Examining c:\win-pvdrivers direct...

Hello All, While i was able to do a ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-ldapsam with no errors, i did encounter the ff when running 'make': ======================================================= Script started on Tue Jun 25 11:52:59 2002 # make install Using FLAGS = -O -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380

A big compile time regression. Any ideas? Ciao, Duncan. On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04

...mpted. Several of the configuration usability parameters are showing NO. Expecially the CoreFoundation, fcntl, and syscall related areas. I need help determining what my problem is, and is there a place where I can find a definition of what these config entries should say during that process? I compiled the MIT versions of KRB5 and it tested out fine. Thanks in advance, Barry Ogletree 770-653-5086 Here is the configure script output without the warnings: checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are c...

...mpted. Several of the configuration usability parameters are showing NO. Expecially the CoreFoundation, fcntl, and syscall related areas. I need help determining what my problem is, and is there a place where I can find a definition of what these config entries should say during that process? I compiled the MIT versions of KRB5 and it tested out fine. Thanks in advance, Barry Ogletree 770-653-5086 Here is the configure script output without the warnings: checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are c...

llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’: /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16: error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member named

TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - cleaning the

...// Make the runtime library into a module. std::string errmsg; llvm::Module *rtlib = llvm::ParseBitcodeFile( buffer.get(), module_stab.module_ir.context(), &errmsg ); if(!rtlib) { std::cerr << errmsg << std::endl; return EXIT_FAILURE; } // Link the compiled program code into the runtime module. bool failed = llvm::Linker::LinkModules( rtlib, module_stab.module_ir.ptr(), llvm::Linker::PreserveSource, &errmsg ); if(failed) { std::cerr << errmsg << std::endl; return EXIT_FAILURE; } std::cout << "Lin...

Am getting Compiling passdb/passdb.c gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 make: *** [passdb/passdb.o] Error 1 while attempting to make from samba-2.0.3 on Linux 2.0.30 kernel. I have successfully used the same tar to install on a linux Slackware 2.0.34 kernel machine, no problems at all. The same error occurs on two different servers, both made from the same Slackware

I can't build llvm-gcc from working directories updated an hour ago. -Dave /tools/llvm-tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/g++ -c -g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wno-unused -DTARGET_NAME=\"i686-pc-linux-gnu\" -DENABLE_LLVM

Hi, I've downloaded Samba 2.2.4 today and attempted to install it on our Compaq AlphaServers running Compaq Tru64 v5.1A. It configures OK, but "make" produces a few serious looking warnings. I've captured both "./configure" and "make" to the attached text file. Examples: .... Compiling smbd/password.c cc: Warning: smbd/password.c, line 664: In this

Yes. It appears that a bad reference to DataLayout was passed to MachineJumpTableInfo::getEntrySize. I'm using LLVM as a pre-compiled Ubuntu package for this work, so I can't do much more in GDB without building from source. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00000000007565f0 in llvm::MachineJumpTableInfo::getEntrySize(llvm::DataLayout const&) const () (gdb) where #0 0x00000000007565f0 in llvm::Machi...

I've tried to compile 3.5.0 RC2 on MAc OS X 10.6.2 and I get an error towards the end--- any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated--- -----------<snip>------------- torture/../../lib/util/tests/strlist.c:285: warning: passing argument 1 of ?str_list_equal? from incompatible pointer type torture/../../lib/util/tests/strlist.c: In function ?test_list_remove?:

On Jul 24, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > A big compile time regression. Any ideas? > > Ciao, Duncan. False alarm. For some reason that I have not yet been able to figure out, these tests run significantly more slowly when I run them during the daytime, which I did for that run. I checked a few of the worst regressions reported here and they all recovered in subsequent