search for: compile_flag

Well, I updated to cmake 2.8.12.2 but the result of changing that COMPILE_FLAGS to COMPILE_OPTIONS is that quotes are applied incorrectly: quotes are added surrounding the entire set of flags rather than around each individual item in the list. Obviously the build doesn't work (with the compiler looking for files named " -m64 ... ") but checking the relevant bui...

A couple of llvm sub-projects have been failing to build for me for a while (compiler-rt asan and util/unittests, at least). It turns out to be due to the fact that some paths on my system include spaces and other special characters, but the the build.ninja file was not generated with correctly quoted strings. Specifically I'm on OS X and the command is setting -isysroot to a location inside

...s of `__always_inline__`, Eric Fiselier and I stumbled upon the attached test case, which I don't think Clang compiles properly. Here's the gist of the test case, reduced to the important parts (see the attachment if you want to repro): // RUN: %cxx -shared -o %T/libtest.so %flags %compile_flags -fPIC %s // RUN: %cxx -c -o %T/main.o %flags %compile_flags %s -O2 -DBUILDING_MAIN // RUN: %cxx -o %T/test.exe -L%T/ -Wl,-rpath,%T/ -ltest %T/main.o // RUN: %T/test.exe template <class T> struct Foo { inline __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))...

...son steps for each. That at least fits the > model but is still a precedent and requires some deeper test-suite > buildsystem hacking. I think makes sense. We can have the fp-contract-off target and the fp-contract-default target, and use set_target_properties to add -ffp-contract=off to the compile_flags for the former. Then we just need to add the output from the default target as a generated file, and add a dependency on it to the fp-contract-default comparison step. Does that sound right? Are the buildbots still using the makefile-based system, or are they all on the cmake-based system now?...

...make and install documentation. -- here the patch for clang -- Index: CMakeLists.txt =================================================================== --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 104943) +++ CMakeLists.txt (working copy) @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ set_target_properties(${name} PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS ${cflag}) endif(MSVC) install(TARGETS ${name} + EXPORT LLVM LIBRARY DESTINATION lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX} ARCHIVE DESTINATION lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}) endmacro(add_clang_library)

...020-05-19 21:16:37.000000000 +0200 +++ llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-config/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 18:28:03.793999462 +0200 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ set(LLVM_CFLAGS "${LLVM_C_STD_FLAG} ${LL set(LLVM_CXXFLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX${CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD}_STANDARD_COMPILE_OPTION} ${LLVM_CXX_STDLIB_FLAG} ${COMPILE_FLAGS} ${LLVM_DEFINITIONS}") set(LLVM_BUILD_SYSTEM cmake) set(LLVM_HAS_RTTI ${LLVM_CONFIG_HAS_RTTI}) -set(LLVM_DYLIB_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX}") +set(LLVM_DYLIB_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}") set(LLVM_HAS_GLOBAL_ISEL "ON") # Use the C+...

...4.0.1. I get the following error. Do I missed some specific compile option? Compilation looks like this here. |CompilingcontribJIT.cpp PWD:/home/ikuehl/projects-llvm/TurboLisp/domainEngineer Sourcefile:contribJIT Sourcefile type:cpp source sub-folder:src/contrib Compiler:/usr/local/bin/clang++COMPILE_FLAG option:-v -g0 -fPIC -fno-use-cxa-atexit -emit-llvm -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/BOOST/include -std=c++14-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS LLVM_CONFIG_COMPILE option:-I/usr/local/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS option:-emit...

...t/llvm/tools/llvm-config/CMakeLists.txt 2020-05-20 > > 18:28:03.793999462 +0200 > > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ set(LLVM_CFLAGS "${LLVM_C_STD_FLAG} ${LL > > set(LLVM_CXXFLAGS > > "${CMAKE_CXX${CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD}_STANDARD_COMPILE_OPTION} > > ${LLVM_CXX_STDLIB_FLAG} ${COMPILE_FLAGS} ${LLVM_DEFINITIONS}") > > set(LLVM_BUILD_SYSTEM cmake) > > set(LLVM_HAS_RTTI ${LLVM_CONFIG_HAS_RTTI}) > > -set(LLVM_DYLIB_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}${LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX}") > > +set(LLVM_DYLIB_VERSION "${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR}") > > set(L...

...the LLVM test-suite. We have 128,411 files with their original licenses. (http://www.dcc.ufmg.br/~fernando/coisas/c_files_with_licenses.tar.gz) Each file is a single function, that compiles as is---no dependencies are needed. For instance, the commands below work for each individual file: $ clang $compile_flags -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone -S -c -emit-llvm \ "$file" -o "$individual_bc" $ opt -mem2reg -O0 ${user_passes[@]} -instcount -stats -S \ "$individual_bc" -disable-output 2>&1" So, these are my questions: Q1: What do I have to do to start integratin...

Dear all, I would like some help, please, with implementing Hal`s excellent suggestion, which I have reworded as below. Hal has confirmed a previous version of my rewording as a correct interpretation. [I made minor changes since then, e.g. for grammar.] [Abe wrote:] >> I think you [Hal] are suggesting something like this: >> 1) compile the program with FP fusion off,

In order to minimize edit/compile/debug turn time, is there a way to compile llvm tools so that the majority of the files are compiled as if for release (eg, no debug symbols), and only the handful of files that I have touched are compiled for debugging? This will reduce the load on the file system, linker and gdb tremendously. At present, AFAICT, it's all or nothing. -------------- next part

Hi Tom, thanks and congrats for LLVM 10.0.1-rc1 release. [1] shows 2 assets. 10.0.0 RCs had a lot of more assets. I am missing the llvm-project-10.0.1rc1.tar.xz tarball. Will you provide them later or is there a new development/workflow decision I do not know of? BTW, the source zip and tar.gz tarballs show no sizes. I am using Mobile LTE/UMTS to download stuff from the Internet. For now I