Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "comperator".
Did you mean:
comparator
2003 Jul 04
0
Winbind in samba3-beta2 is broken compered to samba3-beta1 on solaris
I compiled samba3-beta2 with the same argument, kerberos- and
ldap libraries as for samba3-beta1.
The ADS join worked as it should.
I am using the same smb.conf file as before:
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 10.0.0.254 (10.0.0.254)
# Date: 2003/06/03 15:37:08
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = SAMBA-NET
password server = *
ads server = w2003server
2020 Jul 19
3
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
...not sure I ever have, so that may be an edge case I can safely ignore).
This is what I have right now for testing. I assume there is at least on syntax error in here ?
if address :is :localpart ["to", "cc"] "kremels" {
if allof (address :count "ge" :comperator "i:ascii-numeric" ["to", "cc"] 2,
(not exists ["list-id","mailing-list" "x-loop"] )
{
fileinto :create "listCC"
}
}
So as I read this, if the list address is not in to or cc, then...
2006 Sep 11
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
>> No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
>> junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
>> for SPEC).
>
> Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes in the current sources, but had
> hoped 4.0.1 wasn't too far behind. This is discouraging. So, it sounds
> like it
2020 Jul 19
0
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
> On 19 Jul 2020, at 04:58, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote:
[stuff]
I have this:
if address :is :localpart ["to", "cc"] "kremels" {
if allof (address :count "ge" :comperator "i;ascii-numeric" ["to", "cc"] ["2"],
not exists ["list-id","mailing-list", "x-loop"] )
{
fileinto :create "listCC";
}
}
I get:
.active_sieve: line 55: error: unknown t...
2020 Jul 19
1
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
...<br>
</div>
<div>
I have this:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
if address :is :localpart ["to", "cc"] "kremels" {
</div>
<div>
if allof (address :count "ge" :comperator "i;ascii-numeric" ["to", "cc"] ["2"],
</div>
<div>
not exists ["list-id","mailing-list", "x-loop"] )
</div>
<div>
{
</div>
<div>
fileinto :create "listCC"...
2006 Jun 26
1
seeking in time, feedback+question
Hi all,
Since this is my first e-mail to the list, let me
start with: Thanks for this wonderful project!!! very
useful indeed.
I was trying to compress some big files and then to
access to small portions and decode only those parts.
I use the streaming mode(the sample codes provided on
the web-site) without the Ogg packaging which seems
useful to me for seeking in time.
When I seek in time by
2011 Mar 19
1
Safe/sane tempfile creation?
I'm used to Debian-based distros which have a tempfile(1) utility for
safely and sanely creating temporary files.
There isn't a comperable utility for RHEL/CentOS systems.
I've been exercising Google-fu looking for a good robust tempfile
generation idiom, but haven't turned one up yet.
Hence this appeal to the lazyweb.
--
Dr. Ed Morbius, Chief Scientist / |
Robot
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/11/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
> >> No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of
> >> junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and
> >> for SPEC).
> >
> > Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes in the current sources, but had
>
2006 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
>> be though.
>
> I'm thinking that effort on 4.0.1 gfortran is not worthwhile, since
> 4.0.1 fails to compile some pretty basic examples, and there are some
> pretty extensive changes between then and 4.2.
ok
>> comperable) to merge the LLVM changes into 4.1. I'm personally not
>> interested in doing the work,
2005 Sep 09
1
Motherboard and processor recommendations
I agree, use either SCSI with hardware raid with a battery backed cache
or use sata/ide with linux software raid. Linux raid SCSI also works
well, but if you go for the scsi drives might as well get the controller
too.
The "firmware" raid on the cheap sata/ide cards have left me stranded
several times, I have had experiences were both an HP and Promise IDE
raid controller have SCRAMBLED
2004 Aug 06
4
de-essing into speex?
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:22:53 -0500
> From: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca>
>
> I think I see what you mean, though I haven't been able to listen to
> your wma file (not everyone has a wma decoder). The problem probably
> only lies in the VBR tuning for wideband which hasn't received much work
> yet. One way to check that is to encode in
2008 Jan 29
1
Virtual Alias Forwarding
I'm having a problem with Dovecot and forwarding of aliases. Any help would
be greatly appreciated.
I'm using Postfix, Mysql, dovecot, amavis.
mysql> SELECT * FROM alias;
| address | goto | domain | created | modified | active |
It seems from the logs that incoming mail is being delivered to the mailbox
via dovecot. Mail gets to the correct mailbox (address field), however, if I
2010 Dec 21
4
How to get a working dovecot.conf?
Hi,
I installed openSUSE 11.3 server version, and followed the guidelines from:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-opensuse-11.3-x86_64-ispconfig-3
Everything works, accept loggin into dovecot.
For many days i tried to get logged into dovecot, from localhost,
from other pc in the lan, from squirrelmail, not possible.
I read manuals on http://wiki.dovecot.org/ and tried to set the passwd db
2004 Aug 06
0
Question
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Steve Lewis wrote:
>
> Right now I just have a link to an MP3 file and it does HTTP transfers
> of the music to whoever clicks on it. It is sometimes very slow and
> that's why they have offered to put in a streaming server. Do I just
> have the plain link to the MP3 file and the server knows how to stream
> it. Probably not. What I
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/11/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
> >> be though.
> >
> > I'm thinking that effort on 4.0.1 gfortran is not worthwhile, since
> > 4.0.1 fails to compile some pretty basic examples, and there are some
> > pretty extensive changes between then and 4.2.
>
> ok
>
> >>
2004 Feb 02
0
[LLVMdev] Libraries? What Libraries?
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out which LLVM libraries (er.. object files that
> is) I should link with my programs. It isn't clear to me what the build
> output of LLVM is. I tried the new make "install" target and got a
> plethora of .o files. The few .a files I got had _likely_to_conflict_
> names such as
2003 Jul 04
1
Is it sombody who has a working pam.conf for Solaris 9 ?
Hi,
I am trying to setup PAM for telnet on my solaris 9 box and the pam_winbind
grant me access but I recieve a acount failure:
Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 pam_winbind[9688]: user 'patrikg' granted acces
Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 login[9688]: login account failure: Permission denied
The values in pam.conf for winbind is:
login auth required /usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so
other
2004 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Libraries? What Libraries?
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out which LLVM libraries (er.. object files that
is) I should link with my programs. It isn't clear to me what the build
output of LLVM is. I tried the new make "install" target and got a
plethora of .o files. The few .a files I got had _likely_to_conflict_
names such as "libsupport.a" and "libtarget.a". None of the .o files
are
2004 Aug 06
2
Question
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to use icecast after my provider installs
for my record company web site. My provider is willing to install it so
I can stream my mp3 files. I'm pretty sure that icecast will be good for
what I want but once it is installed by my provider I'm not sure how I
access it.
Right now I just have a link to an MP3 file and it does HTTP transfers
of the
2006 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > You wrote:
> > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > >> all,
> > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with