search for: compellent

Today, Compellant announced their zNAS addition to their unified storage line. zNAS uses ZFS behind the scenes. http://www.compellent.com/Community/Blog/Posts/2010/4/Compellent-zNAS.aspx Congrats Compellant! -- richard ZFS storage and performance consulting at http://www.RichardElling.com ZFS training on deduplication, NexentaStor, and NAS performance Las Vegas, April 29-30, 2010 http://nexenta-vegas.eventbrite.com

One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is DVD vs Blu-Ray. I've never used Blue-ray before, so is there some compelling reason, as a Linux guy, to want to get Blu-ray?

On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated: >People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in >this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without. > >If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do >it PRIVATELY. It is not just Reindl. People like Nick who feel compelled to continue this persiflage

Are folks in the Centos community succesfully using device-mapper-multipath? I am looking to deploy it for error handling on our iSCSI setup but there seems to be little traffic about this package on the Centos forums, as far as I can tell, and there seems to be a number of small issues based on my reading the dm-multipath developer lists and related resources. -geoff Geoff Galitz Blankenheim

W dniu 20.08.2015 o 13:26, Mauricio Tavares pisze: > On Aug 20, 2015 6:54 AM, "ken" <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> >> One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is DVD vs > Blu-Ray. I've never used Blue-ray before, so is there some compelling > reason, as a Linux guy, to want to get Blu-ray? > First of all, is this going

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > I think this ignores the real problem with the MCJIT debugging interface: it doesn't give MCJIT clients any way of directly accessing and parsing the debug metadata. > Parsing the existing debug metadata isn't necessarily a good idea anyhow. It's not a stable format and is quite large. >

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > > > > So, as a project, there is no anti-library policy in LLD. I think this is > > the misunderstanding one side had. We already provide main-as-a-library > > feature so that you can embed the linker to

On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and will

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > For techincal discussions on design it's better to post to the > development list. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > > > > > Currently libvirt supports metadata in the domain XML. This is very > > convenient for

I am using CentOS 5.0 on my desktop workstation. Are there any deeply compelling reasons to upgrade to version 5.1? I read through the release notes but didn't see any whiz-bang new features. Perhaps some of you can share your personal experience letting us know if you have noticed any differences, etc.

Do people have any recommendations on which Samba version to choose for production use, as a domain controller and authentication database for 802.1x only? (i.e. no file sharing) I note that: * CentOS 7 comes with samba 4.2.10 - labelled as "do not use" on https://www.samba.org/samba/history/ !! * Ubuntu 16.04 comes with samba 4.3.11 (although 4.3.12 exists) The Ubuntu/4.3.11

Hello! At Sony we've seen some serious customer interest in having the 'this' pointer visible throughout an entire function during debugging. However, optimizations may eliminate it after its last use, so we've been looking for a way to artificially extend its liverange to the end of the function. So far, the most compelling way we can think of, and one we have used successfully

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 11:50 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> Because almost no other piece of software out there doesn't have >> 'check' depend on rebuilding the target it's testing and it's bitten >> people whereas other than the lameness of our build system

I am currently running v1.1.20 and was wondering if there is any compelling reason to upgrade to v1.2 or v2.0? For example is there any security updates in v1.2 or v2.0 that aren't included in v1.1.20? The other major thing I would be interested in knowing is there any speed enhancements in the newer versions? I am using basic PAM Auth and Maildir mailboxes on a Linux box. Let me know

Just popped back on the list because I was curious about this. I've read the information about virtualization and other new features. I'm just wondering (as someone who installed CentOS 2 years ago and basically hasn't thought much about it my OS other than using it since then) if any piece of it except for virtualization got updated significantly enough to consider an upgrade. My

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > TL;DR - I want this. For the most part, +1 from me too. A few comments though. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:11 AM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > ## Matchers > > To start off, it

Hello all, I''m looking for suggestions for integrated Blog + Wiki (Bliki) apps. I''d prefer Rails, I want to hear opinions on all options! I''ve browsed through W:Bliki <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliki>. Nothing in that list is immediately compelling. This is for my wife, who is not a technologist, and has a need to create a information-centric website.

W dniu 20.08.2015 o 13:52, Mauricio Tavares pisze: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Marcin Trendota <moonwolf.rh at gmail.com> wrote: >> W dniu 20.08.2015 o 13:26, Mauricio Tavares pisze: >>> On Aug 20, 2015 6:54 AM, "ken" <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> One of the build options for a laptop I'm looking at buying is

On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Give a compelling argument and I might :) The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong set of binaries. On the other hand, it does happen that I run "make check" repeatedly, when working on a testcase (or a set of

A long time ago I suggested that we might want to add gmock to compliment the facilities provided by gtest in LLVM's unittests. It didn't go over well: 1) There was concern over the benefit vs. the cost 2) Also concern about what the facilities would look like in practice and whether they would actually help 3) At the time, I didn't have good, large examples of what these things might