search for: compatility

Hi Uwe Liqqes, Does the successful compilation for R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.1 depend on the IBM AIX compiler for C and C++ (xlc/xlC)? gcc on AIX is not compatible with R1.9.1. Kexiao -----Original Message----- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de] Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 8:19 AM To: Liao, Kexiao Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] Install R on AIX 5.2 64 Bit

Hi, After an upgrade, I discovered yesterday strange things I would like to share here. Basically, I'me comparing platforms: The first one is a 2.6.26 (Debian Lenny) platform, with Asterisk 1.6.1.18, Libpri 1.4.10.2, Dahdi revision 8853 (must be between 2.3 and 2.5, I think). The second one is a 2.6.32 (Debian Squeeze) platform, with Asterisk 10.5.1, Libpri 1.4.12, Dahdi 2.6.1. Both are

On 10/13/2016 7:10 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> Mmn, that didn't work. I dd'd the latest Fedora Live iso onto a USB >> drive, put it into a brand spanking new Dell Latitude E7470, hit F12 >> at Dell logo and got "Selected boot device failed". Do I need to make >> it bootable using fdisk or some such? > Not that I recall - a simple dd of the iso onto a usb

I''m really newbie in roby on rails. I''m studing but I can''t find an answer to this question: I''m looking for the classic tamplate that I can found on every ruby-on-rails generated sites: I would like to use in my site I can found some already listed? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:18 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/29/2016 5:55 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: >> >> It seems optical drives are gone. Do I boot the iso from USB or what's >> the procedure now? > > yup, put iso on USB, go to town. Mmn, that didn't work. I dd'd the latest Fedora Live iso onto a USB drive, put it into a

...ing Centos on 'em. > > Not sure if you've seen my question, but I'm considering to purchase a laptop, run EL7 on it, and I'm weighing between the Thinkpad and Latitude, so: > > What was it to make you opt for E7470 over, say, Carbon X1? According to RedHat's Hardware compatility list Carbon models are certified, > while none of the Dell's aren't. > > Also, have you given up on CentOS over Fedora? I'd love to hear how's CentOS 7 support for E7470 hardware. Hi Milos, The Thinkpad T series and Latitude are *very* similar computers. They are both bus...

...39;em. >> >> Not sure if you've seen my question, but I'm considering to purchase a laptop, run EL7 on it, and I'm weighing between the Thinkpad and Latitude, so: >> >> What was it to make you opt for E7470 over, say, Carbon X1? According to RedHat's Hardware compatility list Carbon models are certified, >> while none of the Dell's aren't. >> >> Also, have you given up on CentOS over Fedora? I'd love to hear how's CentOS 7 support for E7470 hardware. > > Hi Milos, > > The Thinkpad T series and Latitude are *very* simi...

Dear Martin, I think that your plan makes sense. It's too bad that aov() behaved differently in this respect from lm(), and thus created more work, but it's not be a bad thing that the difference is now explicit and documented. I expect that that other problems like this will surface, particularly with contributed packages (and I know that you're aware that this has already happened

Hello all, Let give the background. We replaced our PDC with a new machine. Both old and new machines are running Debian 6.0 Squeeze and Samba 3.5.6. moved all data and user accounts to new server. New server has the exact same configuration files as the old server. All machines have been rejoined to the domain both WinXP and Win7. The WinXP machines work perfectly all domain

>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:13:02 +0200 writes: >>>>> Fox, John <jfox at mcmaster.ca> >>>>> on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:45:07 +0000 writes: >> Dear Terry, >> Even the behaviour of lm() and glm() isn't entirely consistent. In both cases,

>>>>> Fox, John <jfox at mcmaster.ca> >>>>> on Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:46:44 +0000 writes: > Dear Martin, I made three points which likely got lost > because of the way I presented them: > (1) Singularity is an unusual situation and should be made > more prominent. It typically reflects a problem with the > data or the