Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "compatibiity".
Did you mean:
compatibility
2011 Oct 18
0
maybe there's something i don't understand
...or more...
20% of those re-starts taught me something valuable.
and, after a while, all of those lessons start to add up.
> this is far from a "real" parser so the maintainers will
> have to start from scratch and it's unlikely they can provide
> 100% backwards compatibiity for their flavor of markdown
i must be misunderstanding something again, because
it seems to me that mr. odgaard is saying that he wants
"100% backward compatibility" for each of the variants...
or at least his own; but then each developer will say that,
which effectively means backward...
2009 Jan 29
32
Facter - the future - your input needed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
We''re currently looking at the next release of Facter and the future
direction of the tool. I''d like to try and prompt some discussions on
facter and what people want from it.
As a starter here''s some (although not all) of the ideas we''ll be
working through:
1. Namespaces - add a namespace or tiered