search for: compartmental

Dear Colleagues, Our group is also working on implementing the use of R for pharmacokinetic compartmental analysis. Perhaps I have missed something, but > fit <- nls(noisy ~ lsoda(xstart, time, one.compartment.model, c(K1=0.5, k2=0.5)), + data=C1.lsoda, + start=list(K1=0.3, k2=0.7), + trace=T + ) Error in eval(as.name(varName), data) : Object "C1....

...nerate AVX code. Ideally we'd have a testcase for each AVX pattern but that's probably overkill. Still, we'd like a lot of tests, I think. Should these tests go into CodeGen/X86 or should I create a new space, like CodeGen/X86/SIMD? I tend to favor the latter as it keeps things more compartmentalized and cleaner. -Dave

...$ Aborting the entire build becuase a single tool doesn't work is not good. Actually, since we're on the subject, the core CVS module for Vorbis is getting big and sprawling. I'm thinking it may be time to start spinning off the tools and plugins into other CVS modules in order to compartmentalize maintainance of this kind of woe. Monty Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/

...felt exactly the same way. I didn’t want LCSSA just as another mechanism for updating SSA. I’m warming up to having it run during the early loop passes if it - significantly simplifies the LICM logic - greatly speeds up SSAUpdater within loops (maybe little net compile-time increase on average?) - compartmentalizes loop transforms and SSA update so we can debug loop opts one loop at a time I still don’t particularly like that we force all LLVM clients to perform LCSSA when all they end up doing is rotating and simplifying loops (no LICM/unroll). So it is a tradeoff. -Andy

...39;d have a testcase for each AVX > pattern but that's probably overkill. Still, we'd like a lot > of tests, I think. > > Should these tests go into CodeGen/X86 or should I create a new space, > like CodeGen/X86/SIMD? I tend to favor the latter as it keeps things > more compartmentalized and cleaner. Adding a subdirectory here sounds good. "SIMD" might be a bit too general though; how about test/CodeGen/X86/AVX? Dan

...AVX > > pattern but that's probably overkill. Still, we'd like a lot > > of tests, I think. > > > > Should these tests go into CodeGen/X86 or should I create a new space, > > like CodeGen/X86/SIMD? I tend to favor the latter as it keeps things > > more compartmentalized and cleaner. > > Adding a subdirectory here sounds good. "SIMD" might be a bit too general > though; how about test/CodeGen/X86/AVX? This will be a rewrite of all the x86 SIMD stuff so the name seemed appropriate. It'll be testing the whole infrastructure, not just AVX....

Hi. To compartmentalize things a bit (e.g., to help limit the damage should one of my machines be hacked and my private RSA keys stolen) I use different RSA key pairs on my different client machines. So it occurs to me that it would be nice if ssh could log which key was used when logging in to a particular account th...

...s an example at t = 0: landscape <- data.frame(polygon_ID = seq(1, 10, by = 1), beta = sample(c(100, 200, 400, 600), 10, replace = TRUE), gamma = sample(c(25, 26, 27, 28), 10, replace = TRUE)) To study the disease dynamics, I also am developing a compartmental model based on a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Here is an example to represent the system of ODEs: solve_sir_model <- function (times, parameters) { sir_model <- function (times, states, parameters) { with(as.list(c(states, parameters)), { dSdt <- -beta*...

Don''t get me wrong, JavaScript/Ajax helpers in Rails are a huge timesaver and they have helped me to finally overcome my irrational aversion to js libraries like prototype and such. However, all this goodness seems to come at quiet a price. The resulting code is littered with inline JS, including ubiquitous script tags and onload attributes etc.. It seems that just when i found

Hi Vivek, You could work around this by creating a custom ISD node, e.g. MyTargetISD::MyLSHR, with the same type as the general ISD::LSHR. This custom node will then be ignored by the generic DAGCombiner. Convert ISD::LSHR to MyTargetISD::MyLSHR in DAGCombine, optimise it as you see fit, convert it back or lower it directly. I've done this for ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS to avoid an inconvenient

...Bayesian modeling tools with Stan: Create re-usable tools for the Bayesian modeling of pharmacometrics data that can integrate diverse data sources (including pre-clinical, in-silico model predictions, etc.). Using the latest Stan?s facilities (http://mc-stan.org) develop templates/functions for compartmental PK models and indirect response PK/PD models. Produce documentation in the form of a modeling report and a presentation. Requirements: Second or third year PhD student in (bio)statistics, machine learning, computer science, engineering or related discipline. Strong computing background, includi...

...ultiple flip-angle acquistions (inversion recovery coming soon!) Conversion to gadolinium contrast agent concentration Parametric models for the arterial input function (AIF), both literature-based (Tofts-Kermode and Fritz-Hansen) and data-adaptive. Kinetic parameter estimation using a variety of compartmental models (e.g., Kety, extended Kety, etc.) Estimation via nonlinear regression (Levenburg-Marquardt optimization) or Bayesian methods (MCMC) Semi-parametric methods via Bayesian P-splines (MCMC) A detailed vignette has been included as a "tutorial" for the package and permission was obt...

...ultiple flip-angle acquistions (inversion recovery coming soon!) Conversion to gadolinium contrast agent concentration Parametric models for the arterial input function (AIF), both literature-based (Tofts-Kermode and Fritz-Hansen) and data-adaptive. Kinetic parameter estimation using a variety of compartmental models (e.g., Kety, extended Kety, etc.) Estimation via nonlinear regression (Levenburg-Marquardt optimization) or Bayesian methods (MCMC) Semi-parametric methods via Bayesian P-splines (MCMC) A detailed vignette has been included as a "tutorial" for the package and permission was obt...

Hello, Is there any way to park a call on a specific park number? If this is not possible, is there any way to create multiple park orbits? Also, is there any way to invoke call parking of an active call coming through a Zap channel from the manager interface? MATT---

...logon box when I attempt to access its contents, which won't go away. Oh, I've also done net ads groupmap for the local users group to the domain's "Domain Users" group. My goal is to setup ubiquitous SMB shares for my Windows domain users to a simple domain member server and compartmentalize that access based upon group membership. I've steeled myself against the inevitable lambasting I'm sure to get for whatever boneheaded mistake I've made, so I'm asking for help from the group on this one. After doing my RTFM research I'm stumped. ??????????????????????????...

Sorry -- it's 1:00 AM and I'm tired. Can somebody give me some ideas on how to do buffering cross-platform? open (O_NONBLOCK) - ??? select (fd+1, NULL, &set, NULL, &tv) - NO - Unix only fork(); open (block) -- Unix only threading -- cross-platform mess plugin modules - too much work ifdefs - evil ??? I'm probably missing something obvious, right? See line 1. Kenneth

...> landscape <- data.frame(polygon_ID = seq(1, 10, by = 1), > beta = sample(c(100, 200, 400, 600), 10, replace = TRUE), > gamma = sample(c(25, 26, 27, 28), 10, replace = TRUE)) > > To study the disease dynamics, I also am developing a compartmental model based on a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Here is an example to represent the system of ODEs: > > solve_sir_model <- function (times, parameters) { > > sir_model <- function (times, states, parameters) { > > with(as.list(c(states, parameters))...

On 7/23/2013 1:36 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > This isn’t just a nitpick. This is exactly why you’re seeing > differences. The pass managers aren’t always set up the same, for example. > > FWIW, I feel your pain. This is a long-standing weakness of our > infrastructure. What was the motivation for this design? Was it to save time by not creating another process, or were there

Hi Everyone, I''m trying to formulate my thoughts on how views work in RoR and I understand the basic bits - 1. Every controller has its own view defined using rhtml files in the views/[controller_name] folder. 2. There is one "view" file (rhtml) for every in the controller and has the same name as the method. 3. For portions that are common, partials can be used - file

...till be very unhappy if they write a top-half-extending-saturating-absolute-difference builtin and we give them 100 instructions of emulated gunk back. While I agree with the underlying sentiment that we should strive to minimize the intrusion of target-specific intrinsics as much as possible, and compartmentalizing them into their source backends as much as possible, expecting to reach a world with no intrinsic considerations in any part of the frontend or optimizer just seems hopelessly idealistic. —Owen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ll...