search for: comparrison

...f I had four genome sequences, G1, G2, G3, G4 the comparisons would be: G1:G1 G1:G2 G1:G3 G1:G4 G2:G2 G2:G3 G2:G4 G3:G3 G3:G4 G4:G4 I can think of a way this might be done with a very complicated loop, which would take the region in the window of each genome and then make all possible combination/comparrisons: So the loop would take G1, and then in turn compare against G2, G3, G4. Then it would take G2, and start again and pair it with everything from G1 to G4, then it would take G3 and compare with everything from G1 to G4, and then finally would take G4, and compare it with everything from G1 to G4....

Hi the function density() does normally integrate to one - I've checked it and it works and I also read the previous threads. But I realised that it does not integrate to one if I use from, to or cut. My scenario: I simulated densities of a plants originating from an sseed source at distance zero. Therefore the density of the plants will be highest close to zero. Is there anything I can do

Hello, I am the author of the Bonk audio compression program... i've just been looking at your comparrison table, and i noticed bonk gets marginally better compression than Flac on some files (actually i was rather surprised to see bonk on the list at all, it's not exactly high profile :-) ). Bonk in lossless mode is a pretty naive implementation of a predictive coder, so the main difference must b...

--- Paul Harrison <pfh@mail.csse.monash.edu.au> wrote: > Hello, > > I am the author of the Bonk audio compression program... i've just > been > looking at your comparrison table, and i noticed bonk gets marginally > better compression than Flac on some files (actually i was > rather surprised to see bonk on the list at all, it's not exactly > high > profile :-) ). Paul, cool to see you here... I thought bonk was in limbo since I couldn't even see...

Hey guys, im trying to get my friends to come up at the top of the act as ferret search. I would query the whole result set first, then move my friends to the top, but the thing is, Im paginating my results and use the offset and limit parameters in the multi_search() function. Anyone know how to do this? Thanks in advance... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.