search for: compare_xxx

...es = 0; > static int enable_uids = 0; > static int enable_xattrs = 0; > +static int no_compare_xattrs = 0; > +static int no_compare_perms = 0; > +static int no_compare_extra_stats = 0; > +static int no_compare_times = 0; > +static int no_compare_uids = 0; Instead of "no_compare_XXXX", I'd name them "compare_XXX" defaulting to 1, as avoids some mind twisting in expressions like: if (!no_compare_perms) ... > static int time_t_output = 0; > static int time_relative = 0; /* 1 = seconds, 2 = days */ > static const char *checksum = NULL; > @@ -1...

...sion were creating a compatibility problem with the original image we wanted to reproduce. I can see no harm in showing all the informations even if we are ignoring them. I think we wanted to see all them anyway to get confirmation that things worked they way we intended. > Instead of "no_compare_XXXX", I'd name them "compare_XXX" defaulting > to 1, as avoids some mind twisting in expressions like: > if (!no_compare_perms) ... So what the argument should look like when invoked ? virt-diff --compare-xattrs=0 ? What you suggest should be the name of the argument to sho...

Hi, we needed these changes when we had to build a guest image compatible with a starting guest image but not backed by it in any way? We needed some tool to check our progress, comparing original and? rebuilt (from scratch) images, and virt-diff seemed the best option, but? we had to soften the comparison to reduce the noise in the output. I added some options to ignore certain informations when