search for: compabibility

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "compabibility".

Did you mean: compability
2005 Nov 27
2
pxelinux -> pxeboot load?
Hi all, I've searched the depths of the resources on the internet; however I'm having trouble deploying a pxeboot solution via pxelinux. So far what I have successfully implemented in my infrastructure is a successful pxeboot setup for FreeBSD ( without the use of pxelinux ). I'd ultimately like to have a solution that will allow me to choose a network install of various Unix-like
2015 Sep 07
3
RFC: alloca -- specify address space for allocation
On 2 Sep 2015, at 02:54, Joseph Tremoulet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Reading further, I see both that addrspacecast "can be a no-op cast or a complex value modification"[2] and that bitcast "may only be [used on pointers] with the same address space"[4]. > > So I'm getting the impression that it's ok to have a model with
2004 Dec 26
1
Preparing for Shorewall 2.2 -- End of Support for Shorewall 1.4 is near!
...fter the upgrade. 4) A new IPTABLES variable has been added to shorewall.conf. This variable names the iptables executable that Shorewall will use. The variable is set to "/sbin/iptables". If you use the new shorewall.conf, you may need to change this setting to maintain compabibility with your current setup (if you use your existing shorewall.conf that does not set IPTABLES then you should experience no change in behavior). 5) The default port for OpenVPN tunnels has been changed from 5000 to 1194 to reflect the recent IANA allocation of that port for OpenVPN....
2015 Sep 01
2
RFC: alloca -- specify address space for allocation
Thanks, this makes the use case much more clear. Now though, as far as I would like actually to see supported in LLVM the capability of not having any special meaning assigned to address space 0 your proposal goes slightly in contrast with how I always thought of address spaces in LLVM. I also have to say that I don’t know deeply how address spaces are meant to be intended in LLVM so my vision of