search for: comp_id

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

Hi I''m having a issue with one object when try to update the attributes in this object previously saved in the database I have one object comp and one object reg they have this relationship comp has_many regs reg belongs_to comp when run use the method valid? like this current_contribuyente.comps.build(params[:comp]).valid? it returns: IndexError (string not matched) And when

On 03/09/2020 20:01, Andrew Walker wrote: > Whoops, fumbled my response a bit. slice size by default is 200,000, > and to clarify the SID passed into murmur3() is the domain SID, not > SID?of individual user. Though, manpage for sssd-ad should be > consulted for precise details. My understanding though is as long as > everything fits in one slice, then you can just use RID. If

...onsistent as possible in an environment. Think of the case of MS AD domain with multiple Samba file servers (some with SSSD for domain join and some with winbind). src/lib/idmap/sss_idmap.c indicates that ids are calculated based on the RIDs that are covered by a particular slice: ``` static bool comp_id(struct idmap_range_params *range_params, long long rid, uint32_t *_id) { uint32_t id; if (rid >= range_params->first_rid && ((UINT32_MAX - range_params->min_id) > (rid - range_params->first_rid))) { id = range_pa...