search for: commmon

...============== # rpm --verbose --verify jpackage-utils.noarch ........ /etc/java ........ c /etc/java/font.properties ........ c /etc/java/java.conf ........ c /etc/java/jpackage-release ........ /etc/java/security ........ /etc/java/security/security.d ........ /etc/jvm ........ /etc/jvm-commmon ........ /etc/maven ........ c /etc/maven/maven2-depmap.xml ........ c /etc/rpm/macros.jpackage ........ /usr/bin/build-classpath ........ /usr/bin/build-classpath-directory ........ /usr/bin/build-jar-repository ........ /usr/bin/check-binary-files ........ /usr/bin/clean-binary-files...

...nt this on a CentOS system, so here goes... I would like to be able to setup a dhcpd (or like) daemon to maintain two IP address pools. One for devices whose leading three octets of the client MAC address are specified and the other for all other clients. Both pools would be a defined range on a commmon /24 subnet. There a several static IP devices also on this net (servers, printer, etc...). At no time would there be more than a dozen of the specified MAC range devices active. I considered splitting the /24 block into two /25 blocks and creating a shared-network with two subnets, but that still...

The spec seems to be unclear on this: should two comment haeders who only differ in the order of comments be considered equevalent? VCE shows comments in the order read and allows to store them in any order (it has move up/down buttons). Comment editors with a fixed layout (like the commmon TITLE/ARTIST/etc. fields in PP's winamp plugin) don't show the order and give no control of it. The spec mentions having multiple comments of the same kind: ARTIST=John ARTIST=Jake ARTIST=James In such a case I think the ordering should be considered important, while the ordering between...

...be tweaked as least to some extent. Given my inexperience, it seems that the R2HTML path is so far the most promising (but for me untried so far) One of the nice things about SPSS and Statistica is that it is VERY easy to copy and paste output from the program right into the paper / paper. A commmon trick when using SPSS is to first paste the output into a spreadsheet (e.g. Excel), and from there into the document. In any case, the outcome is that the output is a table (not a table in the R sense) in the document, which may be edited, tweaked, adding borders etc.. So, what I am looking f...

Hi, i think this message should be removed ;) paradigm:~# umount /mnt2 paradigm:~# mkdosfs /dev/fd0 mkdosfs 2.5 (07 Jan 2000) paradigm:~# /tmp/syslinux /dev/fd0 paradigm:~# sync paradigm:~# mount /dev/fd0 /mnt2 VFS: Can't find an ext3 filesystem on dev fd(2,0). Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense"

Hello, I frequently have to export a large quantity of data from some source (for example, a database, or a hand-written perl script) and then read it into R. This occasionally takes a lot of time; I'm usually using read.table("filename",comment.char="",quote="") to read the data once it is written to disk. However, I *know* that the program that generates

Hi all, this small patch series implement guest SMP support for ARM, using the ARM PSCI interface for secondary cpu bringup. Stefano Stabellini (4): xen/arm: basic PSCI support, implement cpu_on xen/arm: support for guest SGI xen/arm: support vcpu_op hypercalls xen: move VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to common code xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++