Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cominancefrontierbase".
Did you mean:
dominancefrontierbase
2009 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 Dominance Frontier Problem
...ine. IIRC, dom info
> verifier is not enabled by default.
No, it's not and it looks like that was the problem.
This looks like it's another misuse of C++. When I turn on
--enable-expensive-checks, things blow up all over the place. There's an
increment of a singular iterator in CominanceFrontierBase::compare.
I fixed this issue and that solved the problem on my current testcase.
We really need to start testing with --enable-expensive-checks. After
finishing up the details of our merge, I'm going to go polish the validator
some more.
-Da...
2009 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 Dominance Frontier Problem
I just finished upgrading our LLVM to 2.4 and I immediately ran into a problem
with dominance frontier calculation:
llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:714: void
llvm::PMDataManager::verifyDomInfo(llvm::Pass&, llvm::Function&): Assertion
`0 && "Invalid dominator info"' failed.
Strangely enough, the Pass running when the assert triggers is Dominance
Frontier
2009 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 Dominance Frontier Problem
On Feb 18, 2009, at 8:00 AM, David Greene wrote:
> I just finished upgrading our LLVM to 2.4 and I immediately ran into
> a problem
> with dominance frontier calculation:
>
> llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:714: void
> llvm::PMDataManager::verifyDomInfo(llvm::Pass&, llvm::Function&):
> Assertion
> `0 && "Invalid dominator info"' failed.