Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "comeau".
2001 Mar 04
1
not in network neighbourhood
...samba according to the Howto and I'm not sure but I
can't find my samba box in netowrk neighbourhood. If I run
\\(samba IP address) I get it fine. It just doesn't show up in the
nethood. Any ideas?
BTW, I'm using win95 and linux RH6.1
======================================
Dave Comeau -- Network Administrator
Save the Rainforests, Eat vegetarians
2001 Oct 23
1
IPFW and SAMBA
What rule would I add to my firewall script in order to keep external
requests for 137,138, and 139, but allow the samba server on the same
machine, to allow requests from the internal network?
I am using FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE with ipfw and natd.
--
===
Sincerely,
David Comeau
2004 Apr 30
5
[LLVMdev] Benchmarks
...rs Dhrystone and zlib for
comparisons.
There's no clear winner as all compilers perform well in some areas and
poorly in others. The overall rating (Table 2 in the article) ranks the
compilers thusly (higher is better):
Intel 8.0 9.22
VC++ 7.1 7.56
CodeWarrior 7.44
GCC 3.2 6.67
VC++ 6.0 6.00
Comeau 4.3.3 4.56
Borland 5.6.4 3.78
Open Watcom 1.2 3.00
I am, of course, curious how LLVM stacks up in both native code
generation and the CBE. I guess the main point is that GCC is not the
compiler to beat, Intel 8.0 is (at least for the template based tests
this benchmark was aimed at). Any chance we...
2007 Apr 05
1
sizeof(std::string)
Currently we carefully try to pass std::string by const reference
everywhere, which is a good idea if one assumes it's an object of
non-trivial size. Bjarne Stroustrup's guideline is "more than a
couple of words):
http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#call-by-reference
I've noticed that under GCC at least (I tried 2.95, 3.3, and 4.1)
std::string just holds a pointer to
2007 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
...ator for quite some time.
The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the
JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++
to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows:
a) EDG (rather expensive, around USD 100K with source code)
b) Comeau (around USD 25K for customization service and you don't get
the source code)
c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the
expression)
d) gcc2c (trying now, don't know how useful yet)
For more info on the said C to JVM compiler you can check out our
website:...
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote:
>> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
>>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c
>>> developed
>>> by SUN several years ago?
>>>
>> Hi Napi,
>>
>> For one, it converts
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote:
> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> > How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed
> > by SUN several years ago?
> >
> Hi Napi,
>
> For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's
> also under a different license.
Hi
2007 Apr 08
3
[LLVMdev] C++ -> C translation problems
Hi All,
I am trying to use llvm compiler to translate a non-trivial piece of code from C++ to C.
I need this because I need to use part of the code as lib for another project that is strictly C.
I am working under MSWin and I have choice to use either BCC or MSVC.
After a good deal of tries I found out I had to somewhat massage llc -march=c output to make it *almost* compilable.
I have one
1998 May 12
25
Checking remote servers
I''d like to hear some suggestions about securely administering a
system remotely. Here''s the application: a project is going to
scatter some server machines around the US. The server machines will
be running Linux, with the only network servers being a custom
application.
Ignoring the separate question of physical security, how can I
remotely check the system''s